Search results

If one is not preaching Acts 2:38 to sinners then they are against it in my opinion. They need to hear the immediate solution to their dilemma, not get a scriptural massage. They find no peace until they obtain remission of their sins and a clean conscience before almighty God. We need to...

Excellent post!

Actually, the devil has blinded the minds of those that refuse to obey Acts 2:38. However, this is a voluntary blindness. They must go through hell to obey it after being blinded, because the taskmaster will not let them go easily.

Acts 2:38 is a "sugar stick"? Was that Peter's "sugar stick" at Pentecost? Can't you see what ALL INCLUSIVE, the anti-Acts 2:38 crowd has done to you?

I don't preach the gifts of the Spirit to sinners. I teach it to saints that have the Holy Ghost and remission of sins via Acts 2:38.

Praise God for this Acts 2:38 truth.

So, the Jews ordered the Roman government to crucify Jesus? They ordered the Roman soldiers, or were these Jewish soldiers that took over?

My suggestion is to preach to sinners exactly what Peter preached to sinners. That is being led of the Holy Ghost. I had a sinner couple talking to me about being under spiritual attack yesterday, but instead of going to see them and appeasing them in their situation, I told them they must...

I appreciate your insight, but do you preach Acts 2:38 to sinners still?

Like Rome is not responsible for the Christian persecutions either, beginning with Peter in the prison? Were the Jews commanding Rome what to do per the crucifixion? Or, was it a political thing for Pilate to avoid a confrontation??

Yes, Jesus has been given all of his Father's power.

It was a combo. The Romans were the actual executioners but the Jews were the prosecutors, judge and jury. They all had their hands in it.

Shall I leave Acts 2:38 behind and stop insisting sinners and misinformed believers adhere to it? Or, was that a "saint to saint" passage that was comprised of folks whom already obeyed Acts 2:38?

What does that have to do with baptism in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of our sins(Acts 2:38)?

Jesus was talking about Mary only?

I did not infer you thought Acts 2:38 was childish, but I inferred that you were saying we need to put away "childish" things or, "less mature" things as per Acts 2:38. Am I correct?

So, is there a verse that says Mary sits at a throne next to God's throne?

Joseph would beg to differ regarding Mary's "perpetual virginity". It did not take long from after Mary conceived Jesus that Joseph and Mary had their first encounter... 25 And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name Jesus. Oooh la la!

Surely you are not saying obeying Acts 2:38 is a childish thing that can be put away? I thought that verse was speaking of the Millennial reign of Christ per 1 Cor 13?

Do they sit on side by side thrones or does she sit on his lap?