Search results

For lack of understanding you have believed a false doctrine, and now preach what is false. The word "everlasting" is not God or kingdom-speak, but is a worldly figure of speech, just as "yesterday, today, and forever" is regarding a place where there is actually no past, present, or...

Physical resurrection is "but each one in his own order", and yet the old body of flesh remains just as it was for Jesus until he ascended. This is what Paul referred to, saying, "for me, to live is Christ"...confirming also that we are His body and the return of Him in the flesh. There is no...

Again, the wording is correct to the flesh according to the flesh and this world, but also correct to the discernment of the Spirit. Notice that he said "have loved" (past tense) as well as those who "longed for" (any tense).

Paul clarified saying, not as most have believed, "but each one in his own order." Which means, yes "future" for those to whom He has not yet "come in to", but also past for those to whom He has already "come in to." Such is the transition between time and eternity...therefore it was likewise...

Actually...:)...as many "as the sand on the sea shore." As Paul said, "but each one in his own order. "

Yes, I do, and know it to be true...just not the way it is commonly understood. The words are intentionally general so that flesh reads it as worldly, while the Spirit discerns it spiritually. Which is to say, yes bodily--but we are His body. Thus, it is true, He returns bodily by the same...

That is the common understanding, but the words and terms are general and not specific to the end of times, and thus misunderstood. Just as the time of the cross was for all times but enacted in a much smaller way, so too are the events of the end (as a thief) even while many are unaware.

What is stated but not fully realized, is that all that is revealed was "before the foundation of the world." That is, both those of the flesh and the Spirit, both the natural and the spiritual. When we lose time we gain understanding. But the thing that should be understood, is that the...

Stan, The breath of life from God is not air. It is rather Satan who is the god of the air. Reason and responsibility should then easily defined that all who are born of women were first alive in their mother's womb, such as it is for those born of their father.

You accuse me of lies, but it is you who continue in the lie that was foretold, while I tell you the truth which was also foretold. The lie is in the timing, as "future" instead of what Jesus actually said.

Ronald, of course all of that is true, but what does it say, "with flesh?" No, but "with clouds", indicating "with heaven/spirit." It is in that context therefore that "every eye shall see"...meaning all have risen and the world has passed away. It is also in that context that the new heavens...

Indeed. Notice also that He does not say He comes "in the light of the morning after the darkness has passed", but rather during the darkness of "night."

The powers of darkness have their plan coming soon, but will not prevail. Just a prelude to what occurs in heaven.

Do not dispair, there are two sides and we have the upper hand. I don't want to give it away, but those in the know, know that unbeknownst to the afore mentioned darkness, Light has a sting in store.

The bigger general question would be: Can someone be Christian and be WRONG (about anything)? The answer of course is: Yes! (Duh!) Next question: Should Christians be open to self examination and reason? Most definitely.

I like what you have said here, although don't really or always like the restrictions. I liken it to the difference of what is allowed inhouse as opposed to what may or may not be allowed in the street. I guess the exceptions are important--because they do exist, and occur sometimes for and...

The passage and the word from God is general, all truth. But your interpretation is selective, a half truth.

And I quote... "I will pour out my spirit upon all flesh. "

In an attempt to remain kind... No, that is not what I am saying. Like I said, you do not understand. Jesus outlined what would "shortly take place." What I have said is that He was correct, which Paul then elaborated to explain that in addition to Jesus coming "soon", he clarified saying, "but...

The "prince" is Christ (the right hand of God). "The people of the prince" are the Gentiles whom He sends the Holy Spirit--that is, upon "all", including upon the evil and the good, which is the "flood" without water. Therefore, comes destruction. Then comes the end.