Search results

Well, I guess we will find out about that.

Of course all are saved by one Gospel. As Paul has said, during this time of Gentiles, Israel is in blindness. God is dealing with the Gentiles, although a handful of Jews are being saved. But God will save all of Israel and use the Gentiles to do it. Do you have an objection to God saving all...

Yes, and what is covenant theology but Israel joined with the Church, and that is true in the times of the Gentiles. But the national salvation of Israel is is a separate time and separate way of the Church.

Yes from the south, no on the inclusion! You are giving the Church the credit due to Israel. You receive mercy because of Israel, you are saved so Israel can be saved. We all receive the mercy of God, as was His plan. But you deny Israel their heritage with God. He doesn't like that!

Ahhh, the revised version of the Replacement Theology, even better!

Bye, and while I'm at it, if you have any friends here, or anywhere else who believes they can prove their theory of Replacement Theology, tell them Charle24 would like to have conversation with them concerning that subject! It's my favorite subject next to justification by faith alone!

You don't understand why Christ came only to the lost sheep of Israel. You don't understand why they were first choice, and the Church was second choice. You don't understand why God will keep His promise to Abraham and his seed. You don't understand much of anything, and you want to argue...

No it's not, Israel has been partially blinded as Paul said, until the fulness of the Gentiles comes in. This is what dispensationalism teaches, God deals separately with the salvation of Israel and the Church.

What in dispensationalism can't you find? I may be able to help you find it.

Yes, there is no doubt we disagree!

Why not read it like this? Rom. 11:25 "For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery (what has happened to Israel), lest ye should be wise in your own conceits (The Gentiles were not pulled in because of any merit or righteousness on their part, but only by the Grace of...

The flesh is the reference to the covenant of God with Abraham through circumcision. This was claimed as the national salvation by the Jews, being the seed of Abraham and the covenant of circumcision was their salvation, so they said. But Paul said no, Israel is not saved this way.

I can't see faith as an issue when Israel sees their Messiah. Micah 2:12-13 "I will surely assemble, O Jacob, all of thee; I will surely gather the remnant of Israel; I will put them together as the sheep of Bozrah, as the flock in the midst of their fold: they shall make great noise by reason...

Truth, you need to learn some Scripture before you try sell off Israel. All you guys who are in this Replacement Theology have one thing in common, weak knowledge of Scripture. I've dealt with them for many years, they don't know what the Scripture is saying!

Not a single word in Rom. 9:6-8 is concerning the Church! Paul is debunking their claims of salvation. Notice in vs. 7 neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they Children. The word "neither" carries from vs 6, "for they are not all Israel, which are of Israel" is concerning them...

It is the Laodicea Church, the last Church of Rev. 3. They are neither hot nor cold, and will be spued out of His mouth. It is today's Church. They say they are rich, and in need of nothing, but what does Christ say? You are wretched, miserable, poor, and naked. They are naked before the...

Ok, but remember that you are disobeying one apostle (Paul) who makes his stand perfectly clear. The one you are obeying (James), that's much harder to understand, isn't it? Better find out why it seems they are opposite of one another, is my advise?

Yes, they are playing with fire and they're going to get burned.

Everyone here knows I have covered the faith and works that James spoke of, how the Catholics have misunderstood it. And everyone here knows I have covered Acts 2:38 and 1 Peter 3:21 also, several times! So don't tell me you haven't seen those posts!

Address the same thing over and over, naaa! Trump's more fun, but unfortunately off topic.