Search results

No Jesus is not the 70th week. The 70th week never began. Christ's crucifixion ended the 69th week. Prophetically, the 3 1/2 yrs. of his ministry isn't mentioned. Jesus "came" according to prophecy at the 'end" of his ministry when the prophecy of Zech. 9:9 was fulfilled. No Jesus never said it...

Putting together the whole of prophecy to understand the future is the only way to rightly divide the word of truth and I'm not saying I understand it all because I don't but no one else does either. So "cobbling scripture together" is the right and proper thing to do. You're adding things that...

Your quote: "According to who? The beast and his army embrace all who are not in the Lamb's book of life. That sure sounds all-inclusive to me." No it's not that big. The a/c will be in charge of a ten nation confederacy consisting of nations from the eastern part of the Roman empire ( a lot of...

This is an impossible post to respond to but I do have a couple comments to make. 1. Not all premills are pretribs leading to different views of what the millennium consists of. Much of your post is based on assumptions of what "all" premills believe, which leads to much of it being inaccurate...

I think maybe you should stop until you learn reading comprehension. I explicitly said that Dan. 9:27 is the 70th week, but it is a PLAIN SIMPLE FACT, THE 70TH WEEK IS NEVER MENTIONED AGAIN IN SCRIPTURE. That doesn't mean I don't think it exists. As I said in my last reply, I too, presume Rev...

You really don't like to read, do you? I never said that Dan. 9:27 wasn't the 70th week, in fact I said it's the "only reference in scripture about" the 70th week. Everything after that, that we believe is about the 70th week is presumed, that's a fact, but I presume it as well. It's simply the...

I looked back at your scriptures and they aren't biblical proof of anything. Fact, the 70th week is not mentioned outside of Dan. 9:27, Fact, the Aod is not in Dan. 9:27, Fact, none of your timelines state whether they are a first half, latter half or something else. You have never answered the...

No they don't, this should be easy for you then, show me where I "leave the scriptures" and where the 'scriptures" say otherwise.

I think folks have lost the ability to read w/ actual comprehension of what they read. 7 yrs. is 7 yrs. and I never claimed otherwise and who cursed the earth w/ sin? Surprise! it was satan. All those things you mention are methods of the devil to try and stifle the message from individuals or...

There is no way that the prophetic scriptures "rightly divided" would come up w/ the pre-trib scenario.

It's a nice thing to believe but not very scriptural. The church has been enduring satan's wrath for millennia the only difference between now and Rev. 12:12 is Rev. 12:17 and that it will be satan's last chance for a 1000 yrs. to steal away as many souls from God as he can, so it will be much...

Nothing I said leaves the scriptures, just some folks possible errant understanding of it. Listening to "other people" instead of the HS and understanding what God's word "actually" says is why so many folks think they know prophecy but really haven't got a clue.

Folks really don't like to think outside the box, do they? That's too bad really, because most of Christ's sermons were outside the box of the law the people were used to. Maybe I'm not confused and just am willing to consider new approaches to an old subject that mostly creates division. There...

If you actually read what I wrote you would see I was talking about a post-trib rapture but that is not the same as when folks are referencing a post-70th week rapture, imo, the GT will end well before the 70th week does.

The revealing of "who" the a/c is doesn't start anything but perhaps the first seal. The AoD being "set up" is what starts the GT which is mentioned only in Dan. 11:31 or 12:11 and that fulfillment is pictured in Rev. 13:14-15 and the GT could very well be satan's wrath upon the church per Rev...

Try thinking for yourself instead of parroting whatever you were taught. Things in prophecy are never plain and simple as written. If they were, the priests of Christ's day would not have missed it and welcomed Christ as Messiah. If the 'experts" of the first century were wrong and I dare say...

If you insist I can offer you scriptures using the same word "midst" which doesn't mean an exact half. A book can have a first page and a last page and everything in between is considered the "midst" of the book. I don't know what translation you're using but the "abomination of desolation" is...

First of all, I'm not pre-trib. The word "midst" in Dan. 9:27 can mean the middle but it can also mean anytime between day 2 and day 1259. Yes, the 70th week is a 7 yr. period but "nowhere" in scripture is it called a "trib" period! There is no prophecy that speaks of the "latter" half of the...

To be honest, I'm pretty surprised that absolutely no one responded to this post.

You just keep doing whatever makes you happy, but not necessarily correct.