Search results

Sorry but the "people" of the "prince" to come" if one believes that is Christ, were "not" the ones that destroyed the city and the sanctuary and as the article stated the "prince of the covenant" as shown in Dan. 11:22-23 is also most assuredly "not" speaking of Christ. Dan. 9:24-27 is "not" a...

With all due respect, this couldn't be more wrong. Christ is not spoken of again, "after" he is "cut off".

My Strong's has G2411 as the temple as a whole and G3485 as the inner sanctuary only, so Paul is speaking of the inner sanctuary of a physical temple in 2 Thess. 2:4.

There is no coming at the 7th trump, what is being said in Rev. 11:15 is a speaking "forward in faith". The rapture/harvest is in Rev. 14. His return is basically imminent at Rev. 11 but first the harvest, then the vials, then Armageddon. There is no physical return before Armageddon.

Sorry but ending the daily sacrifice is most certainly "not" the AoD. That is a specific event depicted in Rev. 13:14-15 in which the image of the a/c is set up. AE's erection of the image of Zeus in the temple is the "type" for what we are to look for. The AoD is something that is against God...

Sorry Scott, but most folks would assume that yours is the inaccurate take on scripture. Christ was the first one resurrected and those who came out of the graves with him, the next 'order" is the resurrection of the church, in a split second, the dead in Christ are resurrected first then we who...

The woes are in the context of the 5th, 6th and 7th trump. Rev. 12:12 is indeed the third. I believe there is a reason God worded things differently, time, times and 1/2 a time, 42 months and 1260 days. There is no prophecy that says the GT is the latter half of the week as I've explained the...

Rev. 20 isn't a timing it's just explaining where they came from. What do you think Christ was the "firstfruits" of? The passage is speaking of resurrections.

When you really look at it I believe there are 3 1260 day events and the 70th week, when understood just doesn't add up to two equal 1260 day halves as I said in the post I just replied to. I hope you recognize, which many folks don't, is that the woe of Rev. 12 is the 'third" woe that was...

I am not KJ only but I've found that the KJ gives the best overall consistent narrative of God's schedule of events. With that said, there is no specific AoD in Dan. 8 or 9, it is only found in Dan. 11: 31 and 12:11. There is no prophecy that places the AoD in the exact middle of the week. The...

Christ was the first fruits of the "first" resurrection and the church is the "latter" fruits of that same "first" resurrection, that is the order. The second resurrection will be after the millennium.

I never claimed differently. Your first quote is speaking about the resurrections.

Dan. 9:24-27 is written in an order that should be followed as written. The events of vs. 27 comes "after" those of verse 26. Yes, I do believe that Rev. 12 is speaking of a literal flood. Imo, the people are running away towards planes as we witnessed w/ the Afghanistan fiasco and it is most...

Just my two cents but the beast kingdoms will be those from the eastern part of the Roman empire. The nations that the various dynasties had in common that surround Israel.

For everything there is a season...There are two advents prophesied but historicists try to squeeze them all into one thereby seeing only half of what has been shown. One can't have a proper eschatology by denying half of prophesy. If one feels the need to spiritualize what should be considered...

The physical isn't the same as the spiritual. We are in the spiritual kingdom now, the physical kingdom won't be realized until the millennium.

The kingdom of the ten toes is the same kingdom of the ten horns and the same kingdom as the little horn and the same kingdom the final king of Dan. 11:21 to the end, rules over, which is the same kingdom as Rev. 13, which has absolutely nothing to do w/ the Rome of the past.

Dream on brother, dream on.

You're right, it didn't change anything about Dan. 9:24-26 at all, however it does clarify that vs. 27 is still future. The whole purpose of the 70th week is to bring Israel to point of fulfilling Zech. 12:10, 13:8-9 and Matt. 23:39. All things which "national" Israel has not yet fulfilled.

Thanks for your support but one thing you should study on is that I believe it's wrong, is dividing the week into two equal 1260 day periods. While the word "midst" can mean "half" it can also mean any time in the context of. Yes, Rev. gives those time periods but doesn't say if they are first...