Search results

Yes you are correct but I was referencing Gen 1:1 in the text it is plural.

He gave His name to Jesus... John 17 ESV 11 And I am no longer in the world, but they are in the world, and I am coming to you. Holy Father, keep them in your name, which you have given me, that they may be one, even as we are one. 12 While I was with them, I kept them in your name, which you...

Genesis 1:1 God in the Hebrew is masculine plural.

John 14 7 If you had known Me, you would have known My Father also; from now on you know Him, and have seen Him.” 8 Philip *said to Him, “Lord, show us the Father, and it is enough for us.” 9 Jesus *said to him, “Have I been with you for so long a time, and yet you have not come to know Me...

John 10:30 I and the Father are one.

Yes correct, but there is no indication the writings are exhaustive rather the opposite is stated.

Are you serious. First you don't know what I 'suppose' Second you attribute outrageous claims to me - 'error can be true' what planet are you on ??? Sorry but I can't take you seriously. Have a great day,

He can communicate it, but folks insist it must be written...

I appreciate your interpretation, for me I am at peace with Jesus being the Living Word of God and inseparable from Him.

How do you know?

I enjoy my non-mystical perspective as well... Have a great day...

Please enjoy your perspective... 1 Timothy 3:16 Beyond question, great is the mystery of godliness: He who was revealed in the flesh, Was vindicated in the Spirit, Seen by angels, Proclaimed among the nations, Believed on in the world, Taken up in glory.

This does not indicate we know all about God and His Majesty and Wonders... It does indicate we receive revelation from the Holy Spirit.

Through the word He has communicated sufficient to give us basic understandings but the mystery of His Majesty and and Wonder remains. This is not mysticism. 1 Cor 2:9 ...eye has not seen and ear has not heard, And which have not entered the human heart, All that God has prepared for those...

Yes and through the word He has communicated sufficient to give us basic understandings but the mystery of His Majesty and and Wonder remains.

I think the expressions Father and Son do not do justice to the nature of relationship in the trinity. Folks refuse to allow for mystery as if the otherness of God must fit our simple language. To expect the technical analysis of words to reveal the depth of God is a fallacy.

I think the expressions Father and Son do not do justice to the nature of relationship in the trinity. Folks refuse to allow for mystery as if the otherness of God must fit our simple language. To expect the technical analysis of words to reveal the depth of God is a fallacy.

John 17:11 Holy Father, keep them in Your name, the name which You have given Me, so that they may be one just as We are. Same name and in perfect unity.

John 17:11 Holy Father, keep them in Your name, the name which You have given Me, so that they may be one just as We are. Same Name and in perfect unity.

Australian ??? You've got no taste... Just pullin yer leg...