Search results

Just saying if one is going to object to money being wasted by one organization (grass cutting) should not that same reasoning be extended to another (abortion)? Just trying to find some consistency to the messages being sent.

Really??? CraP@! Now I have to report myself for helping derail this thread :(

I take it then you all don't pay taxes to the Federal Government because some of that money goes to funding abortions and the like.

White or brown or molasses?

Just wondering what special ingredients you use to make your chili stand out from the rest of the pack?

ALL moral values are SUBJECTIVE because a moral code is self-centered, that is, decided upon by the individual. What most of you are debating is not morality but ethics. Ethics is over-arching social system to which our personal moral conduct is measured. First, let's toss all the snowjobbers...

No, neither class can be "saved". That is why Angels "long to look into these things [salvation]" 1 Peter 1:12 Hebrews 2:5 says " It is not to angels that he [God] has subjected the world to come...." Christ did not come to save Angels or Demons, but Mankind.

Greg, please just link to an article and comment on it. Please don't cut and paste from published sources. http://ezinearticles.com/?Power-Vs-Authority&id=7198173 Glad to have you aboard, BTW! -BA

Moses wrote about Christ, so if you reject Moses you by default must reject Christ to whom he pointed.

Why do you care? Are you so anxious to judge others you will pick and strain these of the smallest gnats?

Utter foolishness. If you aren't going to bother recognizing legitimate differences between the two then I would wager you're not really that serious about truth at all. If one is willing to play fast and loose with the truth when it comes to their little pet peeves, they can never be trusted...

Sorry, that is a definition of legalism, not religion, ax.

Again, you are putting words in someone mouth and then stomping and hollaring at your strawman. That is your consistent and persistant discussion style and it is disingenuous at best.

You are equivocating on the original statement. David was not present in the upper room when the disciples received the Holy Spirit and power so his example of dancing is non-sequitor to the discussion.

I don't think the disciples on Pentecost jumped around singing and dancing, which is what elysian said. You are putting words in their mouth they did not say. That is a strawman fallacy technique of debating from a weak position in a discussion.

Personally, I don't mind ink (except for Tramp Stamps). Nor do I find objectionable ear piercings... but I draw the line on other parts of the anatomy that get pierced or elongated, or even bifurcated. Purely a societal and cosmetic opinion. I agree with ken, I likes my polyester leisure suit...

She means the so called "second baptism" of the Holy Ghost evidenced by tongues.

It's quite simple when we keep in mind the OP, the Evangelical over against the Catholic teaching. The difference of opinion is how Justification takes place within those verses. Catholics hold to an infusion of righteousness through grace. Evangelicals (Protestants) hold to an imputation of...

Firefox 14!

Antivirus, Avast. Couple that with Malwarebytes. And keeping MS patched, Java UP TO DATE (extremely important), and flash up to date, will go a long way to keeping your PC clean. http://www.biggandyy.com/2011/09/18/virus-insurance/