Search results

"Majority" is a myth. Isaiah recognized it. Isaiah 10 22 For though thy people Israel be as the sand of the sea, yet a remnant of them shall return: the consumption decreed shall overflow with righteousness. Paul confirmed it. Romans 9 27 Esaias also crieth concerning Israel, Though the number...

Did Jesus fulfill "reconciliation for iniquity" for the 3,000 of Daniel's people in Jerusalem who received Him on the Day of Pentecost? Acts 2:41 No one yet has answered this question. Give it your try.

Copy/paste their written words that I refuse to listen to. The ones that you can't find. Don't be slow. :laughing:

Tell Roman historians Tacitus, Suetonius, Josephus, et al that they have not presented any historical evidence. Tell us what they say. :laughing:

Did Jesus fulfill "reconciliation for iniquity" for the 3,000 of Daniel's people in Jerusalem who received Him on the Day of Pentecost? Acts 2:41

From Strong's definition that I quoted. I thought that was evident. Prior to the appearance of dispensational futurism in the 19th century, the understanding of Galatians 6:16 was not in question.

Paul is addressing the Galatian church, comprised of both Jewish (the circumcision) Christians, and Gentile (the uncircumcision) Christians. He does not consider the former to be of greater distinction or significance than the latter. Thus: 15 For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth...

No, that is your hallucinatory attempted contortion of inspired interpretive Scripture to conform to your futurized fantasies and fallacies. You fail again and always. Because "...the scripture cannot be broken". John 10:35

You've quoted your own disproof. Matt 16: [20] Then charged he his disciples that they should tell no man that he was Jesus the Christ. Jesus Christ Himself declared that He was Jesus the Christ. He drew no distinction between Jesus and Christ. Therefore there is no distinction between "in...

Is it not Daniel's people whom you claim will fulfill prophecy in your indeterminate future? If Daniel's people are confined to "the large group of Jews that shared in the Babylonian captivity with Daniel, which was around 120, 000", then Daniel's people cannot spontaneously reappear to fulfill...

Did the 3,000 men of Israel experience Christ's "reconciliation for iniquity" when they received Him?

The point is simple. The 3,000 men of Israel in Acts 2:41 qualified as Daniel's "thy people", and experienced Christ's "reconciliation for iniquity" in Daniel 9:24, fulfilled at Calvary in the midst of the 70th week. Daniel 9:27 As has every one of the multitude of Israelites since that time...

Yes, it says "thy people". And the 3,000 men of Israel in Acts 2:41 certainly qualified as "thy people". Did those 3,000 men of Israel experience Christ's "reconciliation for iniquity" when they received Him?

The 3,000 Jews didn't belong to the whole? What or who did they belong to? Define "whole". Then show us "whole" in Daniel 9.

Daniel 9 24 Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy. Acts...

Amen upon Amen, brother. The vacuity and bankruptcy of all other explanations is contrastingly more than evident.

Hebrews 1 1 God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, 2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds; The Holy Spirit inspired wakadoodle. :laughing...

He gets more hallucinatory by the post. Undoubtedly holds the record for the number of straw men conjured on this forum.

Yeah. Characteristic dispensational multispeak.

So He's Christ to those who are raptured, but Jesus to those who are resurrected. What happens to those who confuse the names, and call Christ, Jesus; or call Jesus, Christ? :laughing: