Search results

Who me?? No...just the foreshadowing of Spirit translation.

Christian

You mean that less than approved seven orthodox churches that both Peter and Paul foretold would without a doubt be infiltrated by false teachers and succumb to strong delusion? Yes, I deny a lot of their teaching. Wake up!

Again worldly and foolish. You are interpreting the glorious appearing of the Son of God, as another lowly worldly event. That is not at all what is being described. Those passages are not telling of a repeat visit return on this level, but the event of all being raised up before God, that...

Your accusation is not only false as I quoted it from the scriptures, but it is also foolish. Having "eyes to see" is not a worldly birth right, but is from God. And the clouds of heaven...are not water vapor. Stop acting like a child.

That is not actually the problem. God has intentionally confused all language (including scripture), so translations are not the problem. In fact, there is no problem. The issue is rather a spiritual one: "The words are Spirit." And therefore, it doesn't matter whether the writer is a man or...

Yes, every eye sees Jesus coming in the clouds, which is to say, in the spirit after the resurrection. The second coming according to Paul is "each one in his own order." Your next question about a literal, presumably worldly visible 2nd coming, is not biblical, as Christ said, "the kingdom of...

The point is the writer was writing to Hebrews who had not all put on Christ, and therefore the words must be rightly divided from those written to those who have put on Christ. The error is not rightly dividing what is written to each different group.

Believe what you will. That is your decision. However, my understanding of what Full Preterists believe is that these things have already fully occurred...but that is not at all what I said.

No, that is not at all what I have been meaning to portray. What I have been saying is the words in spirit--that is, from God's timeless eternal perspective, mean that all that happens in the world is "in the fullness of time"...but in the reality of God--in God, all things occur in the time or...

First you quote a verse from the early path of the Hebrews, then you quote a later verse on the path preached to the gentiles that speaks of the end goal...without "rightly dividing" them. That is like giving someone directions to the market in New York, to someone needing to go to the market...

Again you make a great presentation of the issue. However, that issue comes from parsing "belief" with what can only be defined as doubt. It is only with actually "knowing" that there is no doubt. So, then, salvation does not come between believing and believing, but only between believing and...

Revelation 20:5 ...all in the fulness of time.

These things are considered foreshadowings. But it was broken down for Daniel as "a time, times, and half of time", the apex of which is Christ and the end of sacrifices.

The millennium is just a figure of speech meaning in the fullness of time. Jesus is the apex of all things. The "thousand years" are one and the same. All things occur in His time, which was and is His "day" and "hour", even before the foundation of the world. All of history is just the...

@Jay Ross The difference that you perceive as future rather than past, is simply one of perspective. The one perspective is from heaven telling of that side of the event, while the other perspective is from the world. Yet it is one event. The only reason that some believe it to be future, is...

This touches on two subjects...for which there are two resurrections. Those of the first resurrection are judged already, and have already received eternal life, already called "blessed." The rest of the dead are only raised up in the second resurrection unto judgment, some to everlasting life...

One should be aware by a change of heart. This is the inward evidence of having changed from death to life. After which, if given time and new life in Christ, there are also outward evidences and fruits of the Spirit.

Yes, the rest is merely foreshadowing.

There is a dividing line between water baptism and baptism with the Holy Spirit, between John and Jesus...which, yes, was preached to that generation of whom Christ was "the Last."