Search results

True. And it is a probable corroboration of Daniel 9:27, in which the original text and many translations refer to the "wing of abominations" i.e. the wing(s) of the abominable Roman armies' idolatrous eagles.

Rapture Wimpism Any student of Scripture with even a cursory knowledge of the NT Church knows that tribulation in the form of persecution, suffering, and death has been the lot of the Church ever since its birth. From its persecution at the hands of the Jews, to that under the Roman emperors...

Your 70 weeks are not determined. Your 70th week is decapitated. So you're not "going with what the kjv translators wrote".

There's nothing involving a temple in Matthew 24:15. The word "temple" does not appear there, nor anywhere in the parallel synoptic gospel verses. In Luke 21:20, Luke identifies the abomination of desolation as being the Roman armies. Matthew 24:15 and Luke 21:20 are corroborations of Daniel...

If Jesus did not mean His warnings to be taken literally, then the Judaean Christians did not understand Jesus, because they did take Him literally, and fled and survived; but instead they should have remained where they were, and been slaughtered in 70 AD. Is that what God could have wanted?

Unconventional perhaps, but with legitimate merit, because it arrives at the correct conclusion(s).

Jesus said, "But pray ye that your flight be not in the winter". Does El Al Airlines have difficulty flying in the winter? :laughing:

Once did it. The One Jesus witnessed it from Heaven.

They fled almost 2,000 years ago. None of them listened to you. :laughing: That's why they all survived.

Thanks for the guffaw. :laughing: Yes, to a Jesuit futurist, grammar is not an issue. :laughing: To all authors of Scripture, and to the Holy Spirit who inspired them, it is.

No disagreement. I take my own advice by following the grammatical referent chain all the way from "He" to "the prince" to "Messiah the Prince". Modernist "scholars" stop at "He", or at "the prince", in an attempt to sustain their antichrist fallacy. If read like that, it is obvious to me...

A whole lot of modernist "scholars" do indeed need to learn what the term "antecedent" (aka "referent") means, because instead of following the referent chain from Daniel 9:27 back to its source at Messiah the Prince, they contrive an "antiMessiah", i.e. antichrist, and impose it on the inspired...

If they do not make the pope/papacy antichrist, what do they make him/it? The Judaean Christians heeded Jesus' warning and fled prior to 70 AD. Thankfully, not one of them was a Jesuit futurist.

Thanks bro. It is true that the Roman commander Titus was a prince. However, "the prince" in verse 26 is the grammatical referent of the "He's" in verse 27, and the "He's" in verse 27 are referring unmistakably to Messiah the Prince, not a Roman prince. Additionally the grammatical referent...

That's not the question, as you're well aware. The quotes are obviously claiming that the pope is another Christ, i.e. an antichrist. But you unsurprisingly insist on denying the obvious, which you must in order to perpetuate your antichristian Jesuit futurism. Your inability to provide a...

If the pagan Nebuchadrezzar could be described as God's servant (and he was), Then the pagan Romans could be described as Messiah's people (and they were). A straightforward Scriptural analogy and reality. The book of Daniel was written in the 2nd century BC. Messiah was the prince who did...

No bro. There is only one Individual identified as a prince in the passage. He is Messiah the Prince. It is He who was in command and control in 70 AD, using the Roman armies as His people to accomplish His purposes of judgment and destruction upon apostate Israel.

Jeremiah 43 10 And say unto them, Thus saith the Lord of hosts, the God of Israel; Behold, I will send and take Nebuchadrezzar the king of Babylon, my servant, and will set his throne upon these stones that I have hid; and he shall spread his royal pavilion over them. 11 And when he cometh, he...

Since you're a Reformation denier, you must have some alternative explanation for the apostate papacy's following blasphemous claims: “All the names which in the Scripture are applied to Christ, by virtue of which it is established that He is over the church, all the same names are applied to...

Irrefutably true. And the Jews themselves do acknowledge their role as accomplices in the judgment and destruction unleashed upon them by Messiah the Prince. From the Jewish Virtual LIbrary: "The highly embittered refugees who succeeded in escaping the Galilean massacres fled to the last...