Search results

The Romans were the people of Messiah the Prince whom He used to wreak judgment and destruction upon Israel. Messiah the Prince was not of the Romans. But the Romans were of Messiah the Prince ("the people of the prince") to accomplish His purposes. Scripturally, historically, and grammatically.

Since the Covenant was confirmed by "He" (Daniel 9:27), and since "He" resolves Scripturally, historically, and grammatically back to "Messiah the Prince" (Daniel 9:25), and since the only Covenant that Messiah the Prince confirmed was His New Covenant (Matthew 26:28), then the New Covenant is...

Reformation deniers affirm the following antichrist declarations: “All the names which in the Scripture are applied to Christ, by virtue of which it is established that He is over the church, all the same names are applied to the Pope.” Robert Cardinal Bellarmine, De Conciliorum Auctoriatate...

They began 2,000 years ago. Hebrews 1 1 God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, 2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds;

The Scripture is clear. No further discussion is necessary.

He was writing to the Church that the remnant of Israel is those from the rest of Israel who are saved by grace through faith in Christ, and are thus part of His Church.

We know too. Romans 11 5 Even so then at this present time also there is a remnant according to the election of grace. Ephesians 2 8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Paul was writing to the Church.

So how does God distinguish the remnant of Israel from the rest of Israel? How is the remnant of Israel different from the rest of Israel? How does a member of the rest of Israel become a member of the remnant of Israel?

Correct; I am not SDA or any other denomination.

God demonstrated unmistakably that He doesn't like rebuilt temples.

Reformation Protestants are found in various denominations including SDA.

I'm Reformation Protestant.

I'm stocked up on popcorn. Should be quite a show. https://jewishroots.net/library/anti_missionary_objections/does_the_talmud_take_precedence.html The Reformers were not in error, because God who commissioned them was not in error.

It addresses the false expectation of a rebuilt temple. Without a rebuilt temple, there will be no sacrifice to stop. Pharisaic Babylonian Talmudism is the religion of the Jews. The Talmud takes precedence over the Torah. Christ is the Most Holy Anointed One, 2,000 years ago. Daniel 9:24...

See post 159. There is no Judaism. There is only pharisaic Babylonian talmudism, which Jesus condemned. Mark 7:13

There'll be no next temple. Sozomen (ca. A.D.375-447) "Ecclesiastical History" Book V, Chapter XXII Though the emperor [Julian the Apostate] hated and oppressed the Christians, he manifested benevolence and humanity towards the Jews. He wrote to the Jewish patriarchs and leaders, as well as to...

John Wycliffe, and every other Reformer, had the correct understanding. You don't. Thank God for John Wycliffe and the Reformation.

So who has a superior understanding of the apostate papacy? 1. You. 2. John Wycliffe, who was a priest within it.

John Wycliffe was originally a priest in the apostate papacy, He was intimately familiar with it. He was eminently qualified to recognize and expose it as antichrist. Have you ever been a priest in the apostate papacy?

Amen bro.