Search results

Yes. Its another crucixion/resurrection thread! And I am starting it because some points I have made have gone undressed. Or, if they have been adressed I missed them. Easy to do with multiple pages on the subject. If anyone did address it and I missed it, I apologize. I am flat out stating...

For the time he was here in the flesh, Jesus certainly unorthodox. He was true to the scripture, but shunned what the Pharisees, Sadducees and many other sects did with the scripture.

Hebrews 13:5 KJV Let your conversation be without covetousness; and be content with such things as ye have: for he hath said, I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee.

Hope this will be a light-hearted hearte, fun topic. Take a look at this verse: Nehemiah 8:10 KJV Then he said unto them, Go your way, eat the fat, and drink the sweet, and send portions unto them for whom nothing is prepared: for this day is holy unto our Lord: neither be ye sorry; for the...

You are a good man Rockytopva... Saddens me to hear these problems. But be of good cheer!

Neither was Satan. Furthermore, you are ignoring the points I made. Neither is Satan. Jesus was... So what are you saying? Was Jesus Satan? Furthermore, you are ignoring sime points I made. For me to consider that the King of Tyre (whom was defeated by Nebuchanezzer) OR that Lucifer was...

I see likenesses that are applied to Satan. Not any that apply to him directly.

Hate to say it, but I can't endorse women as pastors. It has bothing to do with their ability. Just that I don't see God approving and actually see him dissaproving. Helps and even teachers: yes. Prophets, sure.

Eze 28 does not apply to Satan, neither was he Lucifer in Isaiah 14. I understand you all see certain landmarks and key phrases that you liken to other parts of the Bible. And yes, there are likenesses. That isn't unusual in the Bible. "Lucifer" in Isaiah is referring to Nebuchanezzer. You...

Its a universal rule in religions. Its also a very good one to follow as a human being apart fron religion. It certainly will hekp you in your earthly life and I encourage all to follow it. But it won't bring you salvation or total peace. To expound, since most religions have a form of this...

My bad... I meant Ester. 4:16 - 5:1. Sorry for the mistake.

"Three days and three nights" is NOT a Hebrew idiom! This is a falsehood that has been around AT LEAST from the days of John Calvin. He too believed it was and idiom and I believe Martin Luther said the same. But its not true! People who believe it is an idiom point to the book of Ruth, but...

I find it all pretty bad, frankly.

We are on a journey and thus waiting for the conclusion of the journey. But few realize the importance of the journey. How you get there is just as important as getting there.

So you didn't like that thread and so you are retaliating? You aren't doing it because its a concconcernYou are just starting trouble cause you didn't like what someone said? Personally, I don't think I have even read the thread. Nor am I sola scriptura so I really don't care either way...

@bbyrd009 I just wish you'd stop using so many acronyms. I had to read your post 4 times before figuring out what AT was. I was reading it as "at" and was pretty confused!

While I do agree with APAK that there is a demonic spirit behind such, I do have somewhat of a different perspective. First, what genre of movies would you like to watch if you stop watching horror? Its tough to find a movie that doesn't have some form of evil connected to it. Not always...

Ok, thanks. I saw the term on this thread and didn't know what it meant... I did mention that... I talked about Hebrews 11. In that chapter the author list several under the law who acted in faith. As for the law... Its not the topic of this thread; I was using it as an example. Therefore...

I wasn't speaking accusingly. I dont know of anyone who says that works are needed on this board. I wasn't going there... I wonder if they really believe it, but I don't accuse. When I wrote that, I was thinking of a radio minister I heard who spoke of works. It was 15 years ago. So there...

Not that I disagree with you on God being truth.... But how can you say absolute truth can be explained but limited? Given the wikipedia example, i can explain why a circle cannot be a square... Unless we are talking about wrestling which talks about a squared circle. Wecannot fully explain...