Search results

With God, that is, in His realm rather than in the world that He created for a time and purpose...there is no timeline. As such, the word of God is only variable by His application to the times, not by men's doings, but according to His providence. The KJV then, is just a spoke in the wheel of...

Okay, so as a preventative measure. That's good. My only caution is that even by mixing with it to study and understand what not to do again, we run the risk of exposure and a humanitarian spirit of compromise. I mean, one of the biggest arguments against God, is that it's "not inclusive"...and...

I am going to start by inserting this post from another thread that is about much the same topic: So...I don't think it matters...and we are talking about God, so what does it matter if they grew testicles, or trunks, or horns? The point is the same--that point being what we should be focusing...

Man's wrath is against men, but God's wrath is for man but against evil.

Interesting...but if we venture off into every possibility, cause, and detail, we miss the forest for the trees. The point is complete in the knowledge that the fall has in fact come since the beginning. And do you not think it clever that the fallen have children who would be allowed to show...

@Moonstone Eterni Not that I am an expert in this field, but because all knowledge comes from God, perhaps I am more so. Forrest, you are correct regarding multiverse theory--it is nothing more than a poor observation of what God has devised. The theory is nothing more than the mechanics of...

Say what is according to your own philosophy--but you have butchered the gospel to do it. And now, being off the path you bring corruption to other matters, even to the doctrine of salvation. These things are on you. So be it. Genesis 22:18 In your seed all the nations of the earth shall be...

If a blindman walked into a Christian bookstore and picked a bible out without any help--it would be perfect whatever version it was. Such is the providence of God regarding His own Word. If one is not first drawn to His word by God--it doesn't matter, he is still on the path that God has...

If you want to say that gentiles that have come into Christ are no longer gentiles--say that. But saying "You cannot show me a single verse of Scripture that says Gentiles are members of the new covenant." is just misleading--it's wrong. Being changed by God--given a new name, is not contrary...

How is it that I gave you two verses and you only read or refer to one of them? You missed the connection between the two: Ephesians 2:13 But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far off have been brought near by the blood of Christ.

Ephesians 2:13 But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far off have been brought near by the blood of Christ. Luke 22:20 Likewise He also took the cup after supper, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in My blood, which is shed for you.

Your rejection of the scriptures I have given by word and by the Spirit, is not the measure of what I have done or not...but rather what you have and have not heard. Welcome to the order of the day. So far you are not fairing well at all. But that I might be of some help to you--do you not...

Do not forget that Jesus also said that His sheep hear His voice. Which is to say, that it is now less a matter of what is written on tablets as it was then, and more a matter of who has the Holy Spirit whom He sent for just such a purpose. His example as you put it, was not to stay in that part...

You are out of context. That was what was preached to those of that evil generation who could loose what they had not fully attained. To the contrary, the conversion of the Holy Spirit--after that evil generation--is the death of those who sin and the life of those who live in Christ, which...

The mystery of marriage is the precedence for me correcting you after 2,000 years of misunderstanding. And, yes, those of Paul's time could have considered him wrong, and Jesus, and Isaiah. Nonetheless, I have given you enough scripture telling of God's methods which most commonly do not seem...

It is God who proves all. It is not a "burden" placed on any. "Reproof" is what I have been doing.

See how you are? I said just the opposite. The point being that men and women believed for millennia that marriage was only about themselves--to most it was a mystery until it was revealed to them.

That is not what I was referring to--because it did not apply to what we were talking, you just tried to use it in vain to justify your position. I was addressing (correcting) your idea of what you quoted from Paul, which you do not understand.

Yes, your general terms. But the context is also general given for those times, but also mixed with those for all time...which is why they need to be "rightly divided" as Paul counselled Timothy. It's good that you are able to think out of the box, but you have missed the mark. The carcass is...

No...not my own thoughts. As for your understanding of the scriptures...even the Pharisees understood the scriptures, or so they thought. Again, if Christ can pick out phrases from the law and the prophets to show Himself the Son of God, He can also insert phrases now as He chooses. And this...