Search results

LOL! You can't be any more delusional than you are. It's not even possible. You are completely incapable of forming coherent arguments using scripture. You can't shoot down anything with your random, reckless and incoherent approach to interpreting scripture.

This is utter nonsense. Amillennialism is not dependent AT ALL on whether or not some useless, meaningless temple is built by a bunch of antichrists in Jerusalem or not. Also, the establishment of modern day Israel does NOTHING to refute amillennialism, either. This is what you have to resort to...

In 2 Thessalonians 2:4 Paul references the temple of God (God's temple). No physical temple in Jerusalem built by those who reject Christ is God's temple. We (the church) are God's temple (Ephesians 2:19-22, 1 Corinthians 3:16-17, 2 Corinthians 6:16, 1 Peter 2:4-5).

I'm not going to waste my time watching the video, but the building of a meaningless physical temple on the temple mount, which would not be the temple of God, would not affect my eschatology at all.

Malachi 3:1 refers to the first coming of Christ, not the second. It references John the Baptist as the messenger who would prepare the way before Him. Compare... Malachi 3:1 “Behold, I send My messenger, And he will prepare the way before Me. And the Lord, whom you seek, Will suddenly come to...

Where does scripture teach any of this? This is all based on speculation and assumptions and not on sound exegesis of scripture. Take the first item on your second coming list, for example. 1 Thessalonians 4:14-17 refers to Christ coming with His own (the souls of the dead in Christ) from...

I'm glad this is the case whether you agree with me or not because it seems like most of the time when I talk to you, you are not understanding my points. Revelation is not a chronological telling of events from beginning to end. That should be clear. Especially when you look at Revelation 12...

Those verses are not referring to two separate comings of Christ. Read 1 Thessalonians 4:14. That describes who will be with Jesus when He comes. It will be "those who have fallen asleep in him". It will be the souls of the dead in Christ. So, the holy ones referenced in Jude 14 refer to the...

Read my post #2 in this thread.

Agree. Notice how my posts are being ignored in this thread. They are not even willing to consider whether or not the throne of Christ's judgment referenced in Matthew 25:31-46 is the same as His judgment seat, which it very clearly is. They are not willing to take into consideration the Old...

Doesn't matter. I was just clarifying what I was saying, which you misunderstood, as you so often do. It's such a waste of time talking to you. All you ever do is say that I'm missing or avoiding the point. There's an easy solution to this. I'm not going to waste my time trying to make any...

I know there is one God who exists as the Father, Son and Holy Spirit and am not saying otherwise. But, God the Father is differentiated from God the Son. And, in verses like Revelation 21:22, the Lord God Almighty is differentiated from the Son, so the Lord God Almighty refers to God the Father...

I agree that his view (the SDA view) of the thousand years is outrageous, but no moreso than yours. At least a fair amount of people agree with his view of the thousand years (unfortunately), but you're all alone with your beliefs.

Well, that was a given. Which is why I questioned whether you really want to go there. Only one of those three (Eusebius) didn't allow for the possibility that it was written by Peter and/or that it was legitimate scripture. After saying what you quoted him as saying there, Jerome later...

Of course we can. And you can drop it at any time without my permission. Great. Whatever. It's absolutely not. Of course, you are probably not understanding what I meant. I'm saying that preterism does not influence my personal beliefs in any way. Which is a fact. Okay, Dr. Pinseeker. LOL...

You just won't let this go. Nothing you said here is anything that you haven't already said multiple times and there is nothing here that we haven't already discussed. You may want to continue to repeat yourself, but I'm not interested in doing that. The only thing I'd be willing to do is...

I'm not, but you never know. Scare quotes? What does that mean? Why play games like this? Just be clear about what you're saying. Whatever. I know you like that word. I'm not bothered that you're bothered, just to be clear. Whatever. I'm not saying that about myself. Preterism has no...

You question if someone who sees Matthew 24:1-34 as all being fulfilled is a preterist or not? Really? How do you define a preterist then? Keep in mind that I'm not talking about full preterism here. He's a partial preterist. So, what I'm really asking is how would you define a partial...

What translation or paraphrase are you quoting there? Things that people do can be both evil and worthless at the same time. The Greek word there can mean either bad/evil or worthless, which is why most translations translated it as bad or evil because that fits the context of what Paul is...

I disagree. The judgment of Revelation 20:11-15 is the same as the judgment in Matthew 25:31-46 which is said to happen when Jesus returns. Why is the book of life opened in Revelation 20:12 if believers are not there? Both Matthew 25:41 and Revelation 20:15 refer to unbelievers being cast into...