Search results

"I believe the Holy Spirit guided me to the date of Revelation." Did He really? Why would He lead you to the wrong date? Hmmm. "This blows your entire doctrine out of the water." Before I begin my refute of your false assertions, let me tell you what "blows" you late-date advocates out of the...

The words speak for themselves, Lizbeth. We "hear" and "see" by faith through diligent study of His Word. We are called to do so and be active about it. I have asked Him about it, Lizbeth, and THEN I studied itfor 5 decades! Actions are CAUGHT; wisdom and knowledge are TAUGHT and LEARNED We are...

I will assume that you know that you are combining two verses: Revelation 4:8 and 22:13. "Holy, holy, holy is the Lord God Almighty who was and is and is to come" (4:8) and "I am the Alpha and Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end" (22:13). Do you recall what John was shown...

I’m sorry this response has taken so long. I have been dealing with other threads whose subjects are not as “complex’ as this one. I was not trying to avoid you. Thank you for reposting the questions. It is my studied opinion that ALL of the visions given to the Hebrew nation upon which would...

"There are things He hides in scripture, according to His will and wisdom." Even if that is true, we must be careful to not risk creating things that aren't there. Perhaps I don't understand. Please explain what you mean about the Gentiles and how the "scriptures are speaking first to the...

That is NOT what Hebrews 10:37 says. Jesus came to His disciples and told them to wait in Jerusalem for the "promise of the Father" (the Holy Spirit). That occurred SHORTLY (a very little while) after His ascension. It was the Day of Pentecost. THEY were to wait for it because it was coming...

The "promised hope" came with the COMING of the LORD to THEM "in a very, very little while" in THEIR day. It's over.

There are over ONE HUNDRED time words/statements in the NT that lead to the truths of Preterism. You deny them and twist them and then you falsely accuse those who take them LITERALLY of being teachers of false doctrine. Hebrews 10:37, which you refuse to take in its clear meaning, is a case in...

God's word teaches FULL PRETERISM. Someday you and all of the name-calling, truth denying manipulators of Scripture will be forced to admit it--either in this life or in the one to come.

And YET, Hebrews 10:37, which you refuse to honestly deal with, teaches that He DID return in THAT time frame. He was coming, at the time of the writing of the book, "in a very, very little while." And He did. In Hebrews 9, the writer states the Christ came the FIRST time to "deal with sin"...

The ENTIRE Book of Hebrews is about CHRIST. The writer states that He came the first time to deal with sin (His Advent) and would come a Second Time for salvation (chapter 9). The subject is CHRIST. THEY were told to not neglect gathering together as THEY saw the "day approaching." That day...

It does not "seem delayed." It IS delayed, Behold. "Hope deferred makes the heart sick" (Prov. 13:12). The writer of Hebrews said "In a VERY, VERY LITTLE WHILE." That meant in their day that His coming would NOT be delayed. What is the CONTEXT of Habakkuk 2, Behold? This deals with the...

EXEGETE THE VERSE!

Christ's physical body, like our physical body, came from the dust. No one who believes is His human nature would deny that. But He went into heaven in a "glorified body." The physical body, according to Paul itself, is the "seed" that falls into the ground and DIES. THAT which comes forth is...

This "Forum" SHOULD allow it becasue it is the ONLY approach that honors the very words of Scripture--especially those of Jesus Himself. Futurism, that denies the very words of Our Lord and Savior, is the "FALSE theory." Preterism teaches that the Second Coming has already happened because...

You are almost there, 3 Resurrections. Jesus was not to come bodily and visibly. Let's really look at the meaning of Acts 1:11. He was to come in LIKE manner--in CLOUDS. That is the point of the angels' words. If Jesus came "in a very, very little while," then the resurrection came with...

You have not exegeted Hebrews 10:37. You are deflecting by referring to a passage in Revelation. But since you did, let's go there. The writer of Hebrews clearly told those of HIS own day that the Lord was coming to THEM "in a very, very little while." And He did. John was shown those...

I continue to accuse you of not having studied the Bible text. You are NOT looking at the words, in context. ALL futurists I deal with do that. They do NOT like what it clearly says, so they create interpretations that are "nuts"! YOU and people like YOU are the ones who create a...

THAT is NOT exegesis, Douggg! Hebrews 10:29-31 concern the same people--those of the writer's own day. THEY were not to neglect meeting together--all the more as THEY saw the "day approaching"--the day of "vengeance" (vs. 30). The writer continues, using the personal pround YE. WE are NOT the...

What is the meaning, in context, of Hebrews 10;37? You do not like what it clearly says, so you skirt around it and accuse me of "inane arguments." What does ANYTHING you posted have to do with the actual WORDS found in Hebrews 10:37. The writer of Hebrews used the time that God created when...