Search results

Can you be more specific? I prefer to debate people who can think and write precisely.

Who is this name? Preamble: For this OP, I distinguish between the term Jesus and the term pre-incarnate appearances of Christ. Jesus was the homosapien born of Mary. After Jacob wrestled with God in Genesis 32: That might be a pre-incarnate appearance of Christ. His name was not disclosed to...

What precisely does not suffice what? Please identify the what1 and the what2 with precision. I prefer to argue precisely. That's why I have put some people on ignore because of their lack of precision in their sentences.

Is there anything about God's identity that you don't know about?

Are you saying that you know God entirely and perfectly?

Right. I do not always answer with, "It is a divine mystery." See A Disciplined Probabilistic Approach to Biblical Hermeneutics

Sure. Have you submitted your Freefree to God?

Right. Right. Right. Right. See Is Jesus God? and follow up there.

Right, it is a divine mystery. If you can summarize the issue in one or two propositional statements, I may be able to offer you a more precise answer.

Thanks for responding. Is there anyone who can?

Right, in terms of human logic. The Godhead is a divine mystery that defies human logic.

Thanks for reading. Describe one of these issues precisely.

Except that with other regular members, I can put him on ignore myself.

English Standard Version Luke 24: After the resurrection, Jesus' body is not like a spirit. Paul spoke of the resurrection body in 1 Corinthians 15: The current physical body is perishable. The resurrected body will not be perishable. It will be a spiritual body according to the new spiritual...

Good point. See No one has ever seen God. Really? and follow up there. Right, this is a logical and divine mystery. When it comes to the nature of God, human logic often fails :)

Can you support your "yes" with some evidence?

Do you think this is a good way to start a debate? Please read the content of my OP before responding to it next time. Please don't waste other people's time by responding to an OP without even reading it. Being a staff member, you should set an example.

Thanks for the info. I tend to be more precise in my definitions. Right, in this case, the meanings of original words overlap and are ambiguous.

What about his Type 1 will? Did you read the OP?

There is only one faculty of volition—the will—for us and for God. Nevertheless, the outputs of the volition can be categorized in different ways: Type 0 outputs of the will of God (or more conveniently, type 0 directives): These are "desires" and "wishes". Type 0 may not be fulfilled in the...