Search results

It just might become relevant in the future. If E.T consistently replaces the God of the Bible, you will be required to give an answer for it, not to me or other believers, but to non-unbelievers, to give a reason for the faith. By all means, be dismissive, at least be honest with yourself...

Well now you know who your real enemies are, they exposed themselves. Your friends may be close to you, but your enemies will always be even closer. Best believe these will be the same creatures calling for our heads in the last days for not believing the lies of "the beast" and worshiping his...

There are no laws or amendment in the constitution requiring the media to report the news in a straight up factual non-sensationalist manner. It is strictly a private business venture. There is no incentive to trust the media on anything whatsoever.

The evidence that they are the same woman is their relative location John gives both. The woman in Rev 12 runs into the wilderness, and the woman in Rev 17 is described as being in the wilderness. The other identifier John gives is the term "that great city, which is spiritually called Sodom and...

:rolleyes:.....There is a popular saying that if you can't explain something simply, then it means you don't understand it well enough. This speaks volumes about your so called "renowned" theologians, scholars and pastors who take the simple observations written by John as given to him by the...

Yes, she should be a virgin, if the woman really symbolized the "church". But the woman is not a virgin and John doesn't say its a "church", he says it symbolizes a city, that rules over all other nations. How someone can confuse "that great city" with the church is beyond me, just astounds...

Its interesting how we see so much attention being given to the mark of the beast prophecy, yet the image of the beast that comes before that gets almost no attention. This 'image' will be the ultimate false idol the world will be forced to worship on the penalty of death, yet everyone is very...

They call that making a straw man argument, is what he is doing.

This is getting good man

I don't think these calvinists understands what 'ordained' means like they claim they do.

My opinion, if God specifically tells them to congregate, then do it, otherwise, they would be testing God, which we are not supposed to do. If the government has something to say about it, then maybe they can explain why they still haven't a clue of how "viruses" actually spread, otherwise...

It used to be uncertain to me, but not anymore upon further research.

The torturing part is up for debate among Christians. Some believe they cease to exist, others believe its a place of eternal torment. Considering that the lake of fire is called the second death, I lean more towards believing the former. Mind you, this is not to say that Satan doesn't deserve...

Its called being held accountable for their actions, so they must stand before God to be judged.

They needed to tree to sustain their lives, so yes, they did need the tree. That's why God kicked them out to begin with, so they won't have access to it.

Its not about being afraid of dying, neither do I. A quick, painless death is one thing, a slow painful death is another thing entirely.

Who said anything about the "bill of rights"? Who gave the media the right to spread misinformation? Who holds them accountable for it?

Putting your trust in "authority" figures is exactly the problem. We're not supposed to "trust" them. We're supposed to hold them accountable for their actions, keep their feet to the fire. The only one I "trust" is God.

:) Yes, please do trust God on this matter, for all we know, those 102 "confirmed" cases could be false positives. Testing for so called "viruses" is not an exact science, not even close. In other words, the media is lying through their teeth and they know it, being the typical sensationalist...

Whatever happens, I highly advise you not let them convince you into seeing if you test "positive" for this alleged virus, or take any "vaccines" for it. Viruses don't actually spread like the media claims it does. If it did, we would know how the 1918 Spanish Flu spread in the first place...