Search results

I seriously doubt that. Its more likely just people panicking because the media told them to panic. I don't care for Trump, or politics in general. I never voted a day in my life and likely never will because I consider it a joke, but I can at least appreciate the way he lays the smack down on...

:rolleyes:......No one is asking for commentary on scripture, just honesty when interpreting it...for once. If that's childish, then what does that make your personal interpretation, that only works when scripture is taken out of context?

So you were basically told to believe in God, or else the lake of fire is your fate. I'll keep it simple, to show you why this doesn't make sense to you, just simple logic. If simply not believing in God dooms you to hell, he wouldn't bother with the pretense of a court appearance in the first...

:rolleyes:.......You can say you didn't......doesn't change the fact that you did.

:rolleyes:....And of course you have to skip over half the chapter so you can rob the rest of it of its context, I assume to make it sound like it fits with Calvinist doctrine. It doesn't, for the invitation to salvation is for everyone who seeks it in their heart, and for those who seek, shall...

Yes, this is a very dangerous precedent being set by Christians, and it will eventually bite them in the ass when their wholesome "science" comes out with evidence "conclusively disproving" God. At that point, I don't know what those Christians who put "science" on such a high pedestal are going...

Oh yeah, Jack Parsons, wasn't he a good friend of L. Ron Hubbard? And we as Christians are supposed to take Nasa seriously as a beacon of truth despite its true origins.

Its not going to be hard for Nasa to convince the populace that they found life in space, where ever they claim they found it. For one, a lot of what Nasa does is classified, so they can use this as an excuse to introduce their "evidence" for the first time to the public. For two, this is Nasa...

Actually, the one thing creationists and evolutionists agree on is that humanities lineage can be traced back to one woman and man, or one male and female, through what is called 'mitochondrial DNA'. They just don't agree on when and how far it can be traced back since evolutionists believe the...

Actually, I see what you are saying, since it is prophesied that his body would never see corruption, it imply's that his death was meant to be special. However, this wasn't the case for anyone else. That's why Peter brought up Davids rotting body still being in the grave even well after Jesus...

:) Please do, I'm sure the spirit will clear the air for you, like it did with me.

Yet Christs spirit didn't when he died, neither did Davids according to peter in Acts 2. Thats beside the point anyway. This is supposed to be about the actual resurrection event and when it happens. If John says the resurrection conquers the second death, and the second death kills the body and...

Let us reason: The inference that's meant to be seen with this is that since the second death has no power over the saints, then it means the first death has already been conquered, since the second death doesn't just kill the spirit, but the body as well.

I seriously doubt it, however, revelation does speak of saints that are in heaven apart from the resurrection event spoken of. Now some may mistake this to mean that we really do go to heaven at death by default. This mainly comes from the misunderstanding of what it means to be risen into...

But none of these verses you cite says there isn't a soul. Its not hard to understand when looking at Gen 2. There is no separate body, soul and spirit. Scripture is quite clear that the union of the body with the spirit is what makes us a living soul. You can choose to believe otherwise and...

Its widely assumed that the verse is referring to our skin, our physical bodies not inheriting the kingdom of God, and from this assumption, it is then claimed that the redemption does not include the "flesh". As you point out, this cannot be the case, otherwise there is a clear contradiction...

When we use the word "belief", the inference is that it is based on knowledge. If there is no knowledge of it, then you can't come to believe in it to start with. False doctrines like Calvinism claims the exact opposite. Emphasis is placed on the holy spirit being responsible for this occurring...

True, but I consider the holy spirit the egg, not the chicken. ;)

, I'm genuinely interested in his answer.

@KingdomInCulture Is Jesus a socialist? Was ancient Israel a communist/socialist kingdom? I think we should start there, because God is the same yesterday, today and forever. Does this scripture imply communism to you or more like some form of free market capitalism? I take this to mean that...