Search results

Don't get mad at me that you made a fool of yourself. You said what you do is debunk false doctrines. So Christ's doctrine is false? That's like claiming I said there's only such a thing as rape--no legitimate form of intimacy. To repeat the first post, I welcome thoughtful discussion, but...

I don't have a "doctrine". Quote where I have a doctrine that men must be vegan. You got out over your skis, because you love talking as if you know something.

The OP already preempted and granted objections, some of which you raised, and invited conversation from others who've given thought to the question. It does apply : you wouldn't have raised the objection that was already raised had you read. If you really had read, what was the purpose of...

Hast thou read the OP? Or Proverbs 18:13?

Please recall that I only raised that issue as an example of my argument that something can be a holy command at one point in time, and become a sin at another point in time. Please recall that I only raised that issue as an example of my argument that something can be a holy command at one...

Thanks for the interaction so far--again, per the OP, I do not claim to have a firm answer.

But "future" is relative--now IS the future compared to Noah's day. I do not care what anyone does, I'm asking a question about the Bible. Irrelevant : the point is that God's Holy Commands can, at a later time, become abominable sins. "... but I say make no vow at all... anything beyond...

What does Paul say about the gays? "Receiving in themselves the penalty due their error" : isn't the presence of the penalty proof of the error? Also, if we know a choice leads to an undesirable outcome, but we make it anyway, because it has pleasure, doesn't that become the standard we live...

Lol I'm asking why it isn't mandatory

Also, I'm not sure grains and nuts were included.

Because Jesus uses the original pattern in Genesis as the standard for marriage, restoring it, and because "the lion will eat straw like the ox, a restoration of the lions' original diet, I'm asking why we wouldn't also be restored to our original diet. Something can be a holy command in one...

My question is why it isn't a universal law.

I'm not sure if it is a response to the OP, but I'm asking why restoration of the original diet (if Marriage is restored to the original, and the animals, themselves, will be restored to their original diet--if Messiah is a restorer of things to their original states) is optional. Agree

I dont understand what to do concerning (esp raw) veganism. On one hand, the Bible warns that in the last days, men, following demons' doctrines, will forbid eating foods God made to be enjoyed, and characterizes those who eat only vegetables as weak in the faith. On the other hand, the Bible...

There's nothing new to be said--all you've said is all you've already said, so all I've answered remains applicable. I'm not going to beat a dead horse.

It seems you're aiming to square 1 Jn 3:9 with 1 John 1:8. Again, 1 Jn 3:9 doesn't say Christians don't sin, and 1 Jn 2:1 says Christians have an Advocate with the Father in case they sin (meaning they sin) : your view of 1 Jn 3:9 is an abuse of the text. John already admitted Christians sin...

LOL You actually just quoted 1 john 3:9 to say exactly that didn't you? Don't you remember the conversation we are having? You said this: Then I said this : Then you said this : So, how aren't you denying that you sin? Actually, I knew you would raise 1 John 3:9, which was why I already...

Why do you say that? I read something that seems different in Scripture. 1 John 1:8 If we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. 1 John 2:1 ...I am writing these things to you so that you will not sin. But if anyone does sin, we have an advocate before the...

What did Jesus want His Apostles to teach the world?

Repeating the same falsified idea isn’t going to make it true. Answer to the answer I already provided you. That's how a discussion works--we progress through it by answering successive challenges to our views, gettingthroughthe outer layers to the core so we can see whether its true or false.