Search results

LOL OK So, "now", your answer is that the parables are not binding on Christians. Are you sure you're not a Muslim? I know, also, that some fake Christians cut Paul's letters out, and call him a false Apostle, because they think he disagrees with Jesus. In order to preserve your tradition, you...

LOL Sure, tell yourself that. You reject God's Word to walk in your tradition. God forgave the servant, then rescinded His forgiveness. Can't change God's Word. Go believe your emptiness. You don't have to pretend to "discuss" things here. I can live with you not accepting what I'm saying...

You've consistently vomited up gobbledygook. Go your way. Hahaha

Romans 11 33Oh, the depth of the riches, [l]both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are His judgments and unfathomable His ways!

I use numbers so that my answers can be explicit, and be answered explicitly. I do not run or hide. Please answer the numbered points, point for point (1. ... 2. ... 3. ...). It seems you're evading.

With all my heart, I wish I could be a Monergist. It would be a lot easier than studying and honoring the plain truth of the Word, which is so hard to understand as to be impossible without God's intervention.

Matthew 18, the parable of the unforgiving servant, is, as I have proven, synergistic.

He invited the unforgiving servant by forgiving him (Mt 18). The guy had the righteousness of faith, because it is defined by King David as, Romans 4 6And David speaks likewise of the blessedness of the man to whom God credits righteousness apart from works: 7“Blessed are they whose lawless...

Which words did I add?

You've stated nothing new, so I repeat my response furnished to you earlier https://www.christianityboard.com/threads/osas-gnostic-heresy.63913/page-57#post-1894464

Since you're repeating yourself, I will repeat the response I shared before https://www.christianityboard.com/threads/osas-gnostic-heresy.63913/page-57#post-1894464

1. You'd objected, before, that Jesus wasn't spiritually blind, and wouldn't trust sinners, but here you have Him entrusting a wicked person with, charging him to share, the Gospel. 2. What does it mean to be "given the Gospel"? What is the difference between a secular person who hears (is...

I really wish the Bible was as simple as you all (Monergists) claim it is--the fact is, though, that it just isn't. It makes seemingly mutually exclusive statements, which take prayer and study to reconcile.

What was it, in your view, that the Lord had sowed into the servants, which he expected to reap a harvest of, but which the lazy servant didn't yield a harvest?

I wouldn't encourage anyone to abandon confidence in God, which Monergism can grant, I'm only objecting to arriving at the confidence through a false argument, helpful as it may be.

Ex 32:33 as previously stated Rev 3 says same

You're just wrong. It explicitly states it. Romans 11 9You will say then, “Branches were broken off so that I could be grafted in.” 20That is correct: They were broken off because of unbelief, but you stand by faith. Do not be arrogant, but be afraid. 21For if God did not spare the natural...

Lol I have presented every kind of support, and you emptily complain. I accept you do not like what I've said Scripture clearly says, and that you're not going to accept it. Arrivederci!

Zero specifics.

I said what the verse said, and I showed other passages that say the same (eg. Mt 18). You have a tradition you follow that disallows you from believing these things, and you haven't been able to come up with any justification for rejecting my explanations. What can I say? Go on your way.