Search results

Irrelevant. This has nothing to do with the discussion.

Stop twisting Scripture. Lol

Apparently

Proverbs 18 13If one gives an answer before he hears, it is his folly and shame. Your "response" presents information that is utterly irrelevant.

It's not whether the sin is "OK", but, yeah, you're essentially saying that when you deny that the passage deals with eternal life, that only "chastening" will result.

You're trying to change the topic. The issue is you will be destroyed if you do those things, and we see that is defined as "not inherit Gods Kingdom" in 1 Co 6--despite having been saved, just as the Israelites.

Yeah, God always tells me that, and I don't really know what to make of it. My step father was a Muslim terrorist, and supposedly (I guess logically) having a bad father can affect that.

So, according to you, eternal life isn't at stake in 1 Co 10, despite the fact that the very same sins he's dealing with there are said to be able to keep Christians out of the Kingdom of God (1 Co 6)? People can commit those sins, and eternal life isn't at stake?

Sorry, I connect 1 Co 10 with 1 Co 6 and see that Paul is warning the Christians that they will be destroyed, despite having been saved, if they don't walk righteously.

I set out to prove it, and succeeded.

Does 1 Co 10 warn against committing sins--the very same sins he elsewhere says if you do them you will not inherit Gods Kingdom, and isn't that literally his warning in the passage? That you will be destroyed if you walk in those things?

So, Christians can committed idolatry, immorality, etc--sins he warns against in 1 Co 10--and still inherit Gods Kingdom?

Obviously, I know you didn't literally say that, I was showings your how silly your denial of the obvious teaching you were critiquing was--but if you want out of convo, you can just go, you don't have to find fault with me.

Right... so, what happens if the already-saved people go ahead and do hose things?

Who said that? I sure didn't. But why were they saved from slavery (sin is slavery Jn 8) specifically by the blood of lambs, if it weren't prefiguring our salvation by the blood of the Lamb of God? Why does Paul say they were "baptized", and "ate communion" if he wasn't drawing the comparison...

Also, what is the "correct" understanding of the passage we should be walking away with?

So... all those times the Bible teaches the OT was intentionally a type and shadow of things to come, the Bible is wrong, because what came before were only types and shadows, not the fulfillment of those types and shadows? Lol

What comparison was Paul not making that I am making--and what is the "correct" "takeaway" from this passage?

"Doing good" that counts as "sowing to the Spirit" means that "God works in you to will and to do", and you walk in that, doing those good works the Spirit is working in you to will and to do.

Paul drew the comparison, not me. Sorry, I'm simple. I just believe what he writes.