Search results

Are you arguing that only those holding a Ph.D. in Hebrew/Greek have the ability to understand how to interpret Scripture? If that's what you mean, where did you get your Ph.D. in Hebrew/Greek?

Again, it is foolish to argue for human perfection for any translation! Foolish because you're actually arguing for human perfection!

Do you mean the new birth? The birth that comes to mankind in time, and is from above? The new birth mankind MUST partake of to know and enter the spiritual Kingdom of God? The birth that living human beings obtain by the Holy Spirit in them? If this is what you mean by the second birth, it...

That's silly! He did not try to re-translate. He proved that no two translations are of the original authors from holy men of old who were moved by the Holy Spirit. Anyone arguing for perfection of any translation is arguing for human perfection. As much as I love and mostly use the KJV of...

7t7 you are too consumed by hatred that has so closed your heart to hearing truth that which is really laughable is that you call yourself Truth7t7.

There most assuredly is a long period of time called the day of the Lord which began with the first advent of Christ, the Messianic Gospel age of grace, and it will end when the seventh angel begins to sound that time given this day/age/era shall be no longer. Then Satan will be free for a...

I'm not arguing the Day of the Lord coming the prophets of Old foretell are not the last day when Christ returns in fiery judgment. What I'm arguing is that the coming day of the Lord, the promised Messiah, the prophets of Old foretell is not one day, but an age/era/time that began when the...

Why do you quote only two verses from Zech 14? What else does the prophet prophecy shall come to pass when the day of the Lord comes? Zechariah 14:8-9 (KJV) And it shall be in that day, that living waters shall go out from Jerusalem; half of them toward the former sea, and half of them...

It was not evil that caused the sacrifice and oblation to cease. It was through love that He gave of Himself to be the final sacrifice for atonement. By His shed blood He did away with the Old sacrificial system to usher in a New and better sacrifice of Himself. By sacrificing Himself He...

The second coming on the final Day shall come to those who are not expecting His coming as a thief in the night. But do you really believe the Day of the Lord the Old Covenant prophets foretell and patiently await was the final Day when all that is left alive on this earth shall be consumed...

Every living, breathing creature upon the earth has the breath of life from God, we are all living souls. Death of every living, breathing creature upon the earth is the result of sin that entered into creature through man. If sin had not entered into God's creation there would be no death...

Since you have no understanding of the coming of Day of the Lord in time, and still await His coming as the prophets of Old foretell He would, you are no different than the unbelieving Orthodox Jews who still await the Day of the Lord coming the prophets of Old foretold would come.

If Daniel 7:8-11 depicts the second coming, how do you reconcile vs 12: As concerning the rest of the beasts, they had their dominion taken away: yet their lives were prolonged for a season and time. At the second coming there will be no lives prolonged, we shall be either caught up to meet...

The prophets of Old foretell of a coming Day of the Lord. Is the prophesy of Old the Day of the Lord the Apostles foretell shall also come, or is the Day of the Lord of the Apostles the final Day of the Lord the prophets of Old foretell would come? For example Joel prophecies of the Day of...

Do you believe the prophecies of Old that foretell the Day of the Lord coming was fulfilled through the advent of Christ coming to earth a man?

How do you prove what you allege? It just seems like you jump from symbolic to literal to force fit a preconceived doctrine?

How do you determine what is symbolic and what is literal? You seem to jump back and forth?

Perhaps not futurist, but literalist would better describe your biblical view of eschatology?

So you hold to the doctrine of futurism believing certain books of the Bible are interpreted as being futuristic. Revelations, Ezekiel and the Book of Daniel fall into this category?

That's how I've been reading him also? I find much agreement with him in some things, but then he goes off in this direction that's really difficult to wrap my mind around. And what the heck is Reformed Amil/Preterist doctrine???