Search results

I'm not one for labels. Some of what they believe, I believe; some things I do not.

Learn righteousness and cease from your sanctimonious posturing.

I agree with everything you said. You're the one who said people would be saved and then consigned to wandering in shame and darkness for eternity. The people who are consigned to that fate are unbelievers, even though they might think otherwise. Idle words are those that sound like truth, but...

Cool. Peace and love to you. It really is a non-essential doctrine. People see what they see now "through a glass darkly', but then face to face. That is what matters - that we arrive there. Godspeed, brother.

A merciful GOD allows the ungodly to live and heals them and makes them whole. What kind of being with the power to make whole would make something he loved live eternally maimed. I wouldn't do that to a dog, or even an insect. Either you're not using your mind, or it is a very perverted one.

I don't agree with his exegesis either, now. Yes, Jesus will come again in the clouds, but I think his reference was to the Daniel prophecy when he was speaking with Caiaphus.

Who would want to serve your god or live in it's kingdom? Come unto me all ye that labor and I will give you rest MAIMED! :D ROTFLMAO!

So you think damn isn't an adjective?

So I'm not using my brain when I extrapolate in 4 dimensions, and you confine yourself to 3?

It's weird because Abraham wasn't alive during Elijah's day when there was a remnant of 7000. Nor was the remnant in Paul's day alive then. The only conclusion I can draw from your comments is that you think only 7000 children of Israel will be resurrected at the first resurrection. That's...

Yes, I have read it. What kind of GOD is it that would completely heal maim people on earth, but leave them maimed in eternity? Your mind is very confused.

That's true, and it will align with scripture, i.e., the teachings of those who went before us, every time.

It's not the words that offend. It's called proper forum etiquette.

Not true. Not true at all. In fact, you contradict what Paul said. Paul said those in Christ would be resurrected at the last trumpet. To state that some in Christ won't be resurrected then because they weren't as holy as you is being a false witness of what he wrote. There is no analog...

Loss means loss. It doesn't mean loss of glory, though. It's an analog loss (%), not a digital one (either/or).

Have you not read: For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: Then we which are alive [and] remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the...

Yet I use reason and logic, and you blow me off without addressing those rational points by labeling me an indoctrinated person. I thought that behavior was a characteristic of indoctrinated persons..

I can agree with your belief that there are different levels of dominion within the kingdom, but I wholly reject your teaching that all aren't resurrected at the same time on the grounds that there is no scriptural witness of that. Another thing. Please quit spamming posts with volumes of...

Uh, yeah... That is part of the great mystery. The logos was made flesh (the son) and died. Did the logos lose his divinity when he was made flesh? Yet he died. A great mystery. The carnal mind is death. Why would you tell me to start using it? Jesus is the name of the godhead, but the son is...

But it does require following correct doctrine, i.e., instruction.