Search results

LOL! Which Scripture said "the LXX was originally written in Hebrew"? That's like saying the King James Bible was originally written in Hebrew Aramaic and Greek--no, it was always a translation.

Again, the LXX was never in Hebrew.

So, like so many before you, you reject God's Word Deuteronomy 32:21 in order to preserve your empty tradition. All right.

@Curtis It is an elevated... perhaps, one could say, as a bread dough which has had yeast worked into it... position they suppose they are in.

I think it makes people "feel" (again, "feelings" not "facts") "special"--they "know" something they (wrongly) think others don't know, and so they think they can stand in judgment of others, who are not "special", because they don't have the "special" knowledge, and when they consider this...

Ohh.. I think you were somehow thinking that I'd rejected 3 Enoch "out of hand", "unthinkingly"... no, again, as stated, the reason I rejected it was because as I held to Scripture I found it conflicted with Scripture.

Let's not lose the forest for the trees : this woman is not a Jewess, the Jews were not Black.

1. Maybe you could clarify your point here? Not sure how it relates. 2. I already have been convinced by a Russian Orthodox priest that these are Scripture. I have yet to go to reading though.

1 Kings 11 1Now King Solomon loved many foreign women along with the daughter of Pharaoh: Moabite, Ammonite, Edomite, Sidonian, and Hittite women, 2from the nations of which the LORD had said to the sons of Israel, “You shall not [a]associate with them, nor shall they associate with you; they...

It did : the woman was not Jewish but one of Solomon's many Gentile love interests 1 Kings 11:1-8. She wouldn't have been talking about her skin color unless it had been exceptional, conspicuous, to the "daughters of Jerusalem"--just as the Cushite (whom Moses had married)'s skin had been to...

@Taodeching Are you serious? You said you don't think? LOL I only included that option as a joke thinking no one would admit to it.

So you're finally admitting that God brings non-Jews in to salvation?

Again and again, Paul told people they'd be saved if they called on the Name of "Iesous". Was that "disrespectful" of Paul? You're "correcting" him? LOL Why would the Septuagint, a Greek translation, ever have been written in Hebrew?

If God doesn't get a non-Jewish people for Himself, if the non-Jewish peoples are not included in salvation, God's Word, Moses's prophecy, is nullified Deuteronomy 32:21.

I try to speak out when I feel like people are in danger of being deceived and misled, but that doesn't mean I think those whose beliefs I oppose cannot know God at all--I believe Catholics, Orthodox, Unitarians, Calvinists, Arminians, etc, can all know God... I just want to bring everything...

I said... ...in other words, I think you missed the point.

Don't try to be tricky. Paul says that part of the Gospel is that God will come to judge Romans 2:16--therefore Enoch is preaching the "Christian" Gospel in announcing the coming Day of Judgment. Chock full. No, no, no, no... the OT Scriptures were decided upon by Ezra and the Men of the Great...

1. I'm not losing the forest for the trees : the reason I cited those passages wasn't to argue them individually but as proofs that the God Who "doesn't change" Malachi 3:6 blots people out of His Book, during both Old Exodus 32:33 and New Covenant Revelation 3:4-5 times, but that you make no...

Nope, they are "dead" because they are in sin--as God says "this my son was dead and is alive". "Awake you that sleepeth and arise from the dead and Christ will give you light." The issue is sinfulness. They had had White garments but had "defiled" them. Sin is the reason that they will be...

Anyway, Hebrews 10:36-39 show that endurance is needed specifically because without it "God's Righteous One" will shrink back, and this will make him displeasing to God and God will destroy them. There is then an affirmation that there is a group of "My Righteous Ones" that do fall away to...