Search results

New Creation, New Rest, New Sabbath : no matter how the New Sabbath is defined, no one can be obligated to observe the old which is irrelevant. Did you never wonder why Sabbath-keeping was never commanded in the New Testament?

@Reggie Belafonte Sorry if there was some confusion regarding the title--I didn't want to say "An Affront to God" because there are satanists who frequent these forums and when they read "God" they do not interpret it as referring to the God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob.

Based on what? In 1 Corinthians 5:1-3, we see that a man had his father's wife--and the Corinthian Church was boasting about the sin! With a precedent like that, I don't think there're grounds for this claim that "One who is 'truly born again' could never ... support such things." There's a...

You were never obligated to serve by Law so you were never released from the Law by death, but you were released from the body of sin Romans 6:6, Romans 7:24-25.

I just meant we walk by faith not by sight lol

It's just reasonable, nothing special, to read before responding isn't it? One thing : the death we die with Christ is physical death, hence how the body of sin is done away with Romans 6:6. Without that physical death, a believing Jew would not be exempted from his obligation to serve by the...

Well the same Jesus says hating your brother makes you a murderer. It's the same concept : having the feeling of the act is equal to the act.

John Wesley's last words : “The best of all is God is with us.”

Odd "coincidence" that--you got "bored" at the same time you were thoroughly debunked. "Coincidence"--yes, nothing more than happy "coincidence".

I'm tired. Anything I don't have to do I won't right now.

If you are just agreeing with me I have no obligation to correct your myriad errors. Good night.

Nope, the Greek for "under" means "under the jurisdiction of"--and, besides, if we granted your definition, then we'd have to apply the same to the "under" in "under Grace", which would render us "underneath, as in a prison dug down with Grace as the prison door above us" and that doesn't work...

Edit : My intention here is merely to prove that homosexuality actually is a sin (some people deny that it is), and that we can and should therefore call anyone who claims to be Christian to repentance. I do not deny that a Christian can fall into the sin of homosexuality--that would be...

1. Paul had to respond to an obvious objection : "Oh yeah? You're nullifying the Law and Its righteous requirements? False prophet! You're leading us away from God! God is testing us! Deuteronomy 13:1-11!" That is an obvious thought anyone will have--"If we are not under Law, doesn't that mean...

If you can "forget" the definition of fornication... I don't know what you are thinking about but it needs to be more Biblical. Of course God helps. That's what Christianity is about--God helping us to be holy and blameless.

You don't need any more information--you know what to do. You know fornication (sex with boyfriend) is a sin I'm sure. You're just playing games.

Christianity teaches there is nothing to "decide" but to be faithful or else you face God's wrath. Again, God detests immorality and adultery--it makes Him furious. You need to stop playing games.

I don't think you really appreciate what Christianity is about. Christianity teaches victory over self through God's graciousness.

Are there any what?

If someone is finding themselves attracted, I guess they should get married. That's the end goal of attraction.