Search results

1. The first question is whether homosexuality is a sin at all--then, based on that, the question is whether we can say that a Christian could and/or should be told to repent of it. 2. Based on what are you saying a Christian could never err and commit an abomination like homosexuality? In 1...

Why?

So, it doesn't explicitly denounce homosexuality?

Why is the fact John obtained Mary something outstanding or significant to you? It's just Christ's teaching in action. Matthew 19:29 And everyone who has left houses or brothers or sisters or father or mother or children or lands, for my name’s sake, will receive a hundredfold and will inherit...

You misunderstood (as I'm sure you misunderstand everything) : "Marcus G" is his YouTube username, and he refused, at the end of the chat conversation, to come here and discuss (conceding the debate to me, saying that I won) because he claimed I was making it too difficult to discuss by asking...

The arguments from my side is solid--the proof is you flee in fear rather than face them.

Paul didn't think so--he said the Church corresponded to Eve. Oops!

Answer to all of the Scripture-based answers already provided you. I'll bring some here for you again: You're welcome.

1. Attack my arguments, not me : show how I mishandled Scripture, do not accuse me of deviancy. 2. Now, again, who are Christ's offspring?

1. The Covenant was made with the Jews, yes--Peter and the Apostles--and they were commanded to go and disciple the nations Matthew 28:19. This was because they were appointed as a "Light to the Nations [Gentiles]". What was the intended effect of that discipleship? To cause the knowledge of God...

1 Corinthians 6 denounces homosexuality, in your view, though, right?

You objected to the "sexual" aspect of the Adam-Eve/Christ-Church reality. Who are Christ's "offspring"? Isaiah 53 10Yet it was the LORD’s will to crush Him and to cause Him to suffer; and when His soul is made a guilt offering,g He will see His offspring, He will prolong His days, and the...

1. I cited Scripture to the effect that the Church is Christ's "Eve", and that they "bear children" (spiritually); your objections (since you had nothing substantive to say) were "your misunderstanding begins in your nether regions" "everything is sexual to you". Your intent was to paint me as...

All right. Thanks.

I understand. Here recently I asked him to stay on topic, he shoots back at me "I'm sorry you were offended that I said women and men were meant to be together." He is incapable of honesty. I'm sick of dealing with him. He's out of control.

Please prevent user "Truman the Levite" from posting on this thread. He is warrantlessly and chronically disorderly and disrespectful.

I appreciate your sharing, but, please do not get things confused : the intent of this thread is simply to give an answer to the lie that homosexuality is something that is not to be repented of. That is all. It's not saying we should treat anyone badly, it's simply stating the Biblical doctrine...

To be clear, I believe Catholics can know God. My point isn't "Catholics can't know God". I don't think we need perfect doctrine before we can know God. I just reject the Catholic claim of "infallibility" and its various implications.

Yeah, and these people are so mentally gone they will actually argue it is.

You don't know that accusing someone of making everything about sex is essentially namecalling--that it makes me out to be some sort of deviant?