Search results

So, again, you're responding without knowing what you're responding to. Incorrect, you have not read where I defined my point in the very first statement. If you're not going to read what people say, you're going to think they haven't defined their point. Again, you haven't read what I said so...

What do I supposedly believe that you're arguing against?

What does "talk around the topic" mean? What are you arguing against? What is it you are thinking I am holding to?

Please do not post a bunch of "I agree" stuff. You probably still haven't read the OP either. What a mess. Guys, stop responding without reading the OP.

Correction : You haven't read the OP where I stated what I believed. Correction : I don't hold that Christians serve by the Law. So you're trying to move the goalposts now that you see you've erred? Stubbornness is not something to be proud of.

I was hoping to interact with people who disagreed, but, yes, I also am glad for Grace.

For anyone interested, his contention is that you can't be Jewish and Christian. Obviously, you can, because "Jew" refers not only to a practitioner of a religion but also to an ethnicity. Which part? The part you didn't read? You're still misunderstanding me. I titled it that way because...

The veil of 2 Co 3 refers to that one which Moses had lain on his face not the one on the Ark. Simplify.

If "under" (in "under Law") means "condemned", then "under Grace" means "condemned by Grace". How is that a reason sin will not be your master?

1. Your error is in thinking "Jew" refers only to a religion. 2. I didn't mention non-Jews in the OP for a reason : for Paul, it was a foregone conclusion that non-Jews would not serve by Law (after the greeting in Romans 1, basically all of it addresses Jewish believers in the Roman Church...

LOL

As the footnote mentions, the reason this ruling leads unavoidably (for the Pharisee) to the conclusion that the Commands will be abolished in the "Hereafter" is as follows : i. The ruling is authoritative (cannot be wrong, and cannot be broken), and ii. When the men who were buried according to...

Please feel free to respond to the OP.

I've debated against the OSASers, and against the Monergists, etc--and I haven't changed my mind, I know they're totally off-base--BUT I know that they know God, and I know that they have prayed for me, and God has permitted me to learn priceless truths from them that have changed my life for...

Another one bites the dust. Shameful.

1. Already addressed when I cited Romans 2:29. What is your response to Romans 2:29? 2. Wow, not only did you not read the OP, you apparently didn't even read my responses. Shame. Proverbs 18:2, Proverbs 18:13

Which part did you disagree with, and based on what?

In New Testament Scriptures, "Jew" can be an ethnicity--the religion (Torah) was given to a family (12 tribes of Israel)--so, yes, a "Jew" can also be a "Christian". Case in point: Romans 2 28For no one is a Jew who is merely one outwardly, nor is circumcision outward and physical. 29But a Jew...

You're all the same--here to reveal your opinions, not to seek truth.

Let's see... Oops, you didn't even read the OP. Proverb 18 13He who answers a matter before he hears it— this is folly and disgrace to him. Before I only suspected you did this--ie, didn't even bother reading, exposing yourself to information--now I know for certain you're not interested in...