Search results

Nope, you are the one who is lying, lol. The Catholic Church also has a vested interest in denying its own past; and therefore I don't believe you will find the information coming from Catholic sources.

Was it a 2nd God or 1/3 of God who descended to become a Man?

All I know is that I once knew a character who proclaimed that the Father had sex with Mary and he claimed he got that doctrine from the mormon church. he obviously believed that it was mormon doctrine. That coupled with what is said about mormons, that they often hide what they truly believe...

Nope; I am advocating the Trinity as it should be properly understood. See posts #1-#6 of the following thread: True Trinity.

You have been using those verses in order to try to say that Jesus' Verily, verily, in John 6:47, ought not to have been there. For Jesus said, Jhn 6:47, Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me hath everlasting life. But in applying your verses, you change the meaning of this...

Indulgences was one of the major doctrines of the Catholic Church addressed by Martin Luther's 95 theses. You had better be the one to admit that you are lying. You have been falsely educated, my friend.

This would definitely apply to the rejection of the truth I stated above by many Catholics here on these forums.

Jesus also implied that His mother Mary did not hear the word of God and obey it in Mark 3:31-35.

See Matthew 24:24.

It is mormon doctrine that the Father impregnated Mary. It is the nature of God that He is God from everlasting to everlasting, Psalms 90:2. Also, the Word was God (John 1:1) before He became flesh and dwelt among us (John 1:14); and He would have continued to be God in the incarnation...

Of course, there is this: Pro 28:9, He that turneth away his ear from hearing the law, even his prayer shall be abomination. And this: Jas 1:25, But whoso looketh into the perfect law of liberty, and continueth therein, he being not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the work, this man shall...

No doubt. For by the law is the knowledge of sin (Romans 3:20); it is a schoolmaster to lead men to Christ (Galatians 3:24, Psalms 19:7 (kjv)).

This explains the reason why you cannot comprehend that you have been defeated in the realm of this debate. To @BreadOfLife.

@BreadOfLife, I consider that I have defeated you in the realm of this debate and therefore there is no more need for me to respond to you. For you have never been able to adequately answer the reality of holy scripture that the one who believeth on Christ has everlasting life. The evidence...

Did Peter disobey the Lord when he baptized with a certain formula in Acts of the Apostles 2:38-39?

Jesus is indeed the everlasting Father (Isaiah 9:6); while He is also distinct from the 1st Person of the Trinity in that He is come in human flesh. They are the same Spirit (Ephesians 4:4). Jesus was the Word in the beginning; and the Word was God (John 1:1). Now I know that you may not...

I do believe that the sabbath is a peripheral issue; and having knowledge of the SDA view on the matter I seek to follow it (without going overboard: I do not believe that worshiping on Sunday is the mark of the Beast). The primary issue that the Bible wants us to consider is what is written in...

I do believe that the sabbath is a peripheral issue; and having knowledge of the SDA view on the matter I seek to follow it (without going overboard: I do not believe that worshiping on Sunday is the mark of the Beast). The primary issue that the Bible wants us to consider is what is written in...

In the New Testament? Have you considered that Matthew, under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, takes Hosea 11:1 out of context in Matthew 2:15 and applies it as Jesus being the Son of God whereas in the original verse quoted from, Israel is counted as God's son. And also, have you...

Nope.