Search results

Paul cites and interprets Isaiah in reference to salvation, not the Assyrian dispersion.

Paul identifies "all Israel". Two Israels. Romans 9 6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: 7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. 8 That is, They which...

How many Jews did you say? :laughing: Isaiah 10 22 For though thy people Israel be as the sand of the sea, yet a remnant of them shall return: the consumption decreed shall overflow with righteousness. Romans 9 27 Esaias also crieth concerning Israel, Though the number of the children of...

You believe that "He" is The Antichrist. But you're afraid to admit it.

Who is "He"? You falsely believe and teach that Merriam-Webster wrote Daniel 9:27. :laughing:

Jesus' entire first coming occurred prior to 70 AD. Therefore, Jesus' entire first coming was "A False "Preterist" fairy tale", right? :laughing:

Sure. I can readily accept that both perspectives are concurrently germane.

"While the Romans would have won the war in any case, the Jewish civil war both hastened their victory and immensely increased the casualties. One horrendous example: In expectation of a Roman siege, Jerusalem's Jews had stockpiled a supply of dry food that could have fed the city for many...

Any claim to be the sole and exclusive possessor and purveyor of truth is, of course, classic cultism. And, as you see, there's plenty of it there. :laughing:

But grammatically, the antecedent/referent of "prince" in verse 26 is "Messiah the Prince" in verse 25. Messiah is the only individual in the passage identified as a prince. Messiah was the Prince who came, several hundred years after Daniel wrote. In 70 AD, Messiah used the Romans as His...

I concur that the little horn refers to the apostate papacy. But where is/are the apostate papacy/popes ever referred to as (a) prince(s)? All of the "he's" in Daniel 9:27 refer back to the prince in Daniel 9:26. When did the apostate papacy fulfill Daniel 9:27? Messiah the Prince alone...

It's gnosticism, which is an ancient heresy. There's no such Christian denomination.

I applied your hyperspiritual gnosis to the temple, which you believe represents the body of Christ. Or don't you believe that any longer?

I cited the Greek, which as shown means "will".

You forgot your temple. :laughing: Matthew 21:12 And Jesus went into the body of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the body, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves,

The latter portions of Daniel 9:26,27 were fulfilled in 70 AD. @Spiritual Israelite has elucidated well in post 237.

Hebrews 9:16 Greek 1242 [e] diathēkē διαθήκη , [there is] a will N-NFS True. Which Hebrews 9:15-17 declares.

Is there other supporting Scripture that calls that an abomination? A testament is a will. It can be entirely rescinded and rewritten by the testator prior to the testator's death, resulting in an entirely new testament which comes into full force and effect upon the testator's death, e.g. the...

If the seventieth seven is not determined, then the seventy sevens are not determined, and the result is the same. Strong's Exhaustive Concordance seven, week There is no mention of abomination or antichrist in 2 Thessalonians 2:4. There is a man of sin taking up spiritual residence within...

Daniel declares "Seventy weeks are determined..." That means all seventy. But If one seven remains, then it is decapitated, orphaned, and undetermined, and thus the entire seventy weeks are also undetermined. But all seventy are determined, with the seventieth fulfilled by Christ during His...