Search results

Critical for your eschatology. Not for Paul's or the Holy Spirit's who inspired him. Paul is rigorous and consistent in his identification of and distinction between the different temples. Paul's "naos" temples refer exclusively to NT believers; collectively, the NT Church. Paul's temples...

John identified the singular antichrist as hearsay ("ye have heard"), and corrected the misunderstanding by his explanation of many antichrists. John rejected the hearsay of a singular antichrist.

Of course. I said "these". That's specific. Specific Jews who did not do the will of Jesus' Father in heaven. Specific Jews whose father was the devil, and who were bound for hell. Their Jewish ethnicity would not save them, and never will.

Do you think that faithfulness and obedience are not reasons?

Please answer the question.

God raised up the Reformers to wage spiritual battle against the prevailing antichrist of their time. Through God's Divine prophetic enlightenment of His Word, they recognized that Rome was that antichrist. By God's grace and mercy, and the Reformers' faith, vision, and sacrifice, often to the...

These were JEWS. Did Jesus ever point to them doing the will of His Father in heaven? Matthew 23 33 Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell? John 8 44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do.

God's promises have never been dependent upon ethnicity. But ever dependent upon faithfulness and obedience to Him, His Son, and His Covenants, Old and New. True then, now, and always. Genesis 17:12 And he that is eight days old shall be circumcised among you, every man child in your...

Where in the New Covenant is that?

How will God identify Israel? What will His identification criteria be?

Ribera was a futurist. So is Davy. He's the antithesis of an historicist.

I'm a Reformation historicist. If you know any of them who were Communists, let us know. :D

Why do you do the futurist seminary category? Ribera was a futurist. He fabricated a futurized antichrist in an attempt to deflect the Reformation declaration of the apostate papacy as the prevailing antichrist of that era. You subscribe to Ribera's futurized antichrist. You're a futurist.

All Jesuits, including the Communist ones, believe Francisco Ribera. You believe Francisco Ribera, thus sharing that belief with all Jesuits, including the Communist ones.

So you believe the Communist Jesuit Francisco Ribera.

Thankfully the Reformers were not deceived by Francisco Ribera. Thank God for the Reformation.

The pope is more than pleased with Francisco Ribera's success in deceiving you. :D Thank God for the Reformation.

Afraid, as I suspected. Thanks for the confirmation.

You seem afraid to answer the question. Are these the claims of an antichrist? “All the names which in the Scripture are applied to Christ, by virtue of which it is established that He is over the church, all the same names are applied to the Pope.” Robert Cardinal Bellarmine, De Conciliorum...

So you'd rather believe the fabrications of counter-Reformation Jesuit Francisco Ribera, than your forebears who sacrificed their lives for your spiritual freedom. That's betrayal. Are these the claims of an antichrist? “All the names which in the Scripture are applied to Christ, by virtue of...