Search results

Ever hear of Francisco Ribera? He's done a superb job of duping and deceiving you. :laughing: Turning you into a papist perpetuating futurist fallacies and fantasies. Incapable of understanding what the man of sin has claimed about himself. What you think he will do, he has long ago done...

Francisco Ribera snags another one. :laughing: Obviously you neglected to learn to read. “All the names which in the Scripture are applied to Christ, by virtue of which it is established that He is over the church, all the same names are applied to the Pope.” Robert Cardinal Bellarmine, De...

There's the witness of Scripture in 2 Thessalonians 2, Daniel 7, et al; and the witness of the man of sin himself, which you refuse to believe. There's nothing whatever to "assume" about this.

You need your head screwed back on, straight this time. :D William Tyndale was a Reformer responsible for a number of English translations of Scripture. They are recognized to this day. He was martyred. But he was a premil. So none of his contributions are of any merit. Right?

I responded with my ridiculous comment to your ridiculous comment. That's how ridiculous comments work. :D

I'll take the faith, vision, and sacrifice of the Reformers over your rejections and denials. Every time.

If the plethora of evidence identifying the man of sin is still insufficient for you, there's no value for me in attempting to identify the "little season".

So because it's not in 2 Thessalonians 2, therefore the Reformers never actually burned? :D

FYI bro, the Reformers didn't burn at the stake protesting "a general reference to sinful mankind". :D They burned protesting the deception, apostasy and lawlessness of the man of sin exalting himself, sitting physically in Rome but spiritually in the Church. Showing himself to be God.

“All the names which in the Scripture are applied to Christ, by virtue of which it is established that He is over the church, all the same names are applied to the Pope.” Robert Cardinal Bellarmine, De Conciliorum Auctoriatate (On the Authority of the Councils) Bk 2, chap. 17 “The pope is of so...

Paul doesn't use the "little season" expression, so he didn't tell us when it would begin.

It was my turn for the question. Answer mine, then I'll answer yours.

So we have a claim of deification of a man. That's sin. And we have the ascriptions of divine attributes belonging exclusively to the Father and the Son; to a man. The ascriptions are sins. The man is responsible for what are described in verses 8 and 9. They are sins. To me, these...

It has been going on since the apostate papacy. Your turn.

Who and what is this describing? “All the names which in the Scripture are applied to Christ, by virtue of which it is established that He is over the church, all the same names are applied to the Pope.” Robert Cardinal Bellarmine, De Conciliorum Auctoriatate (On the Authority of the Councils)...

It refers to a Church in which is found both true faith and apostasy. Thankfully, God has always preserved the former despite the latter. Isaiah 59:19. Thus God in His time raised up His standard through the Reformers, to liberate His true faithful Church from spiritual darkness and oppression.

I'll defer to @CTK for that.

He/they didn't sit in the Church.

Paul is consistent in his identification of and distinction between the different temples. Paul's "naos" temples refer exclusively to NT believers; collectively, the NT Church. In which the man of sin takes up residence and arrogates what belongs to the Son and the Father exclusively. E.g...

AIfers abhor history. :D