Search results

For example. Adam was a mortal and almost lived an entire 1K years. Why then would it be unreasonable to think that mortals can live an entire 1K years in the future? Except some of you have mortals dying all throughout the millennium even though it's not until after the millennium any mortals...

Prove what you allege, from the texts themselves. Revelation 8:7 The first angel sounded, and there followed hail and fire mingled with blood, and they were cast upon the earth: and the third part of trees was burnt up, and all green grass was burnt up. Revelation 16:2 And the first went, and...

Look at all the translations below. Unless I missed one, not one single one of them capitalized god in that verse. And it's pretty obvious as to why. It is because God is not meant, satan is meant. I thought everyone at least already agreed with that, that God is not meant, satan is...

You are probably also going to argue that Psalms 106:16 below, for example, doesn't say 'saint', either. Right? If nothing else, the passage below makes it crystal clear, that in some cases qadowsh can certainly mean human saints. But because of doctrinal bias' it doesn't mean human saints in...

Let me ask you this then. Who is it that the text has coming with all the saints in 1 Thessalonians 3:13? Just Jesus Christ? Or the Father as well? Why that matters is because Zechariah 14:5 plainly says the Lord God is coming with all of His saints. There couldn't possibly be 2 different...

Of course it does. Zechariah 14:5 And ye shall flee to the valley of the mountains; for the valley of the mountains shall reach unto Azal: yea, ye shall flee, like as ye fled from before the earthquake in the days of Uzziah king of Judah: and the LORD my God shall come, and all the saints with...

Except he doesn't fully agree with Premils since he does not apply verses 16-21 like Premils apply it. But even so, he still has way better reading comprehension than you do in this case. And that he is way better at putting 2 and 2 together than you are in this case. As a matter of fact, until...

I already backed it up per post # 121 and @Truth7t7 equally backed it up per post # 120. It is absurd that a passage in the OT and a passage in the NT say the exact same thing---that all of the saints come with Him--but is only meaning the 2nd coming in the NT but not in the OT. You never...

Obviously though, it is meaning all things written in the prophets in the OT, since it would be absurd that it can be meaning anything written in the NT when not everything was even written in the NT yet when Jesus spoke those words and Luke later gave an account of it. Therefore, what...

Why do you flat out lie about things like that? You don't think anyone notices?

Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his saints(Jude 1:7) = the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ with all his saints(1 Thessalonians 3:10) = the Lord my God shall come and all the saints with thee(Zechariah 14:5) No one who is expected to be taken seriously would dispute any of that...

There are only Jews and Gentiles. For the past 2K years since 70 AD, what times have we been in? The times of the Gentiles? Or the times of the Jews. Be sure to look outside in the real world before answering that. Then ask yourself who has been dominating the world for the past 2K years? Jews...

Merry Christmas to you too, brother. Apology accepted though an apology was no longer necessary as far as I am concerned. I am already way over that other thing in the past that you are apologizing about. I'm no longer upset about it but was a bit upset about it at the time.

2 Thessalonians 1:7 And to you who are troubled rest with us, when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty angels, 8 In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ: 9 Who shall be punished with everlasting...

Except it's absurd that any of the following happened in the first century, in any sense. when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty angels(2 Thessalonians 1:7) When he shall come to be glorified in his saints, and to be admired in all them that believe (because our...

How do you figure your interpretation allows for the following--and shall be led away captive into all nations(Luke 21:24)?

But even in the OT Scriptures, not everything prophesied involving the NT era is involving the days of vengeance if some are interpreting all those Scriptures correctly. I disagree they are interpreting all those Scriptures correctly. But that is beside the point. Meaning Scriptures they are...

To be fair maybe, He implied it per Luke 21:20-23. Since that did lead to both the city and temple being destroyed some 40 years later. Everything else in the Discourse in all 3 accounts have zero to do with the 2nd temple, though. Meaning after He started answering them once they sat down at...

In another post you said this--"I believe there are lots of clues adding up here". Now apply that to the following. IMO, it matters where Jesus said what He said in the Discourse before He said what else He said in the Discourse later. For example. He said the following first. Luke 21:24...

Dual fulfillment might be a possible option in this case since it would demand a gap between the two. But if it is a possibility, I wouldn't argue the same in regards to Matthew 24:15-22 though, since that is not involving the wrath of God on anyone. It is involving the wrath of satan upon the...