Search results

Since A) can't be fully true, nor can C) be fully true, I choose B) then. I guess that makes only me and @Douggg correct thus far.

Luke 21:22 For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled. 23 But woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck, in those days! for there shall be great distress in the land, and wrath upon this people. 2 Thessalonians 1:7 And to you...

Maybe I wasn't being clear? I was meaning after the disciples asked Jesus their questions and that He then began answering them. He began in all 3 accounts answering in this manner---Matthew 24:4 And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you. 5 For many shall come in...

The END of the OP, finally... Me: all of the above ------------------------- Chatgpt: Excellent. Then let’s do this **cleanly, canonically, and end-to-end**, because once you trace the language *all the way through Scripture*, the inconsistency you’ve been exposing becomes undeniable. I’ll...

The OP continued... Me: What they should be doing is seeing how abominations are being used elsewhere in the NT. Then asking themselves, does any of it have to do with deception, in any sense? Revelation 17:4 And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and...

The OP continued.... Me: The way these interpreters try and get around the 'immediately after' portion in verse 29, they insist it is not meaning immediately after verses 15-22, it is meaning immediately after what verses 23-26 are involving. That those verses are not involving verses 15-22...

The OP continued.... Me: What I find bizarre are interpreters who are not Preterists yet agree with Preterists concerning Matthew 24:15-22 but disagree with Preterists concerning Matthew 24:30. They interpret that verse correctly, that it involves His 2nd coming in the end of this age. But...

The OP continued.... Me: all of the above -------------------- Chatgpt: Excellent. Then let’s do this **systematically and cohesively**, because all three strands actually reinforce one another. I’ll keep the argument tight, cumulative, and text-driven. We’ll cover: 1. **Matthew 24 in...

The OP continued.... Me: Walk through Matthew 24:15–26 line by line in light of discipleship language Talk about why “abomination of desolation” language resists a purely Roman explanation ---- Chatgpt: Great—this is exactly the right way to press the issue. I’ll do this in two movements...

The OP continued... Me: I tend to think one of the main focus' of the Discourse is, either you finish what you started, thus persevere to the end, or you fall away instead. And that it is connected with themes, such as--Mark 8:34-38, which then is connected with Luke 17:31-33, which is then...

The OP is rather lengthy. Will have to post it over numerous posts. I want to further demonstrate how one my sessions with Chatgpt typically go. Pretty much everything Chatgpt has concluded is already my position to begin with. Except it can obviously articulate these things a thousand times...

One can also use Revelation 3:21 to prove reigning with Christ a thousand years is still future, in light of Matthew 25:31 and Matthew 19:28, for example. Revelation 3:21 To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in...

I agree except for maybe one thing, that Jesus is bodily present during all 7 vials. Notice this verse first. Revelation 16:15 Behold, I come as a thief. Blessed is he that watcheth, and keepeth his garments, lest he walk naked, and they see his shame. That is sandwhiched between the 6th...

You are not thinking outside of the box here. For example. Someone gets into an horrific car accident, hangs on to life in the hospital for a few months but never fully recovers and dies from the injuries sustained from the accident. Thus, in this case, in the day they were involved in that...

I'm arguing it like this. Clearly, Luke 21:20, for example, involved the first century leading up to 70 AD. In Matthew 24:23-26, Jesus is focused on the end of this age, though. For example. Matthew 24:24 For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and...

Have you not read this part in Daniel 12:2 though---and some to shame and everlasting contempt. You would have us believe that the saints that bodily rose after Christ's resurrection 2000 years ago, that some of them rose to shame and everlasting contempt? You have to be kidding if you think...

Let me explain then, at least, as to my reasoning. Why do some interpreters argue in this manner? Via earlier context that is no longer relevant to later context? Jesus has the right to move beyond 70 AD in the Discourse. He is not obligated to stay within the first century leading up to 70...

Which is bigger? The planet earth or the universe? If billions of people can fit on a tiny spec in the universe, meaning the earth, are we to believe that the entire universe does not consist of trillions of angels, if not more? If humans were living on other planets and that 8 billion humans...

Let's see if it is absurd, except I realize I can't count on you being objective, thus being intellectually honest about it, because doctrinal bias will be standing in your way, obviously. And the same goes for @Marty fox, in this case, in the event he wants to chime in here. Before we even...

Except you don't realize that Christ can be the first resurrection, and then when one is bodily raised 2000 years later, that it still makes them having part in the first resurrection. But for some bizarre reason Amils think that can only be true if a spiritual resurrection pertaining to the...