Search results

That text is not supporting your thesis. You're forcing your theology into that text as well. Jesus is simply referring to judgment day, where every knee will bow, and every tongue will confess that Jesus Christ is Lord. Matthew 23:39 is saying nothing different.

It doesn't say that. A future millennium is not mentioned there, neither is it mentioned anywhere between Ezekiel 37 and 48. You are forcing that to fit what you have been taught. You need to let the Bible speak for itself.

I thought the 144,000 are the firstfruits? You are making them the last fruits.

Op Note! 1Co 4:9 for we are made a spectacle unto the world, and to angels, and to men. Jesus became man not an angel. Scripture is careful at distinguishing between the two. Heb 2:6 What is man, that thou art mindful of him? or the son of man, that thou visitest him? Heb 2:7 Thou madest him...

The king of Tyrus was not a type of a perfect Adam in the Garden. He is an example of a wicked tyrant who was full of pride who Satan worked through to do his evil. Tyrus was an example of what rebellion against God looks like. He is an example of fallen man not perfect man.

This is supposed to be proof that cherubs are not angels. Basically: because TribulationSigns says so. According to him, we should not take the Bible literal. Spiritual and physical realities are not real. Angels are not real. Satan is not real. Demons are not real. What is next? What about...

Was the king of Tyrus an "anointed cherub" (Ezekiel 28:14&16)? Was he at one time in the "Paradise of God" (Ezekiel 28:13)? Did he protect "the holy mountain of God" (Ezekiel 28:14)? Was he created "perfect" in his ways "from the day" he was "created" till "iniquity was found in" him (Ezekiel...

I never said you were a heretic. You have a lovely Christian way of communicating.

Satan perverted the truth of God after he fell from heaven at the beginning of creation, as these texts show. He had already fallen before creation.

You avoid questions like this because you promote error. This is how heretics act.

This is talking about a time after the fall of Satan and his demons. None of these answer my question. As I suspected, you have nothing. You make it up as you go.

Where does it state this in Scripture?

So where and how did evil come from?

You cannot address simple questions any more. You have so much to hide.

Exactly! Very well put. Talk about promoting nonsense. Fallen man could just soar up into heaven when he wished and communicate with God and then come back down again when he wished. What folly.

And you lead the way!

So who is Satan?

Why are people so intrigued by this? Who cares! Focus on something important. Not only that, but you are wrong. Demons are spirits.

He let the cat out of the bag. He is exposing his own heart. I have no hatred for him or anyone else. I do hate his theology which is from the pit.

The Word speaks for itself. You cannot quote one that supports your nonsense, not one. I have never heard anyone push this apart from the cults! Telling!