Search results

Nope, you didn't demonstrate that the constituent parts of the argument were false. Quote what I said, and, one by one, demonstrate the argument is false.

Quote where you dealt with the argument put forward in the OP.

No, actually, you didn't engage with my argument, falsifying its constituent parts, demonstrating its incoherence.

You're free to interact with my argument when you please.

You haven't interacted with my views at all, you've just regurgitated what ever your Church has regurgitated into your throat. When you feel up to it, I welcome your interaction with my argument.

We're 8 pages into the discussion, and you STILL have no answer to the OP--you are chronically off topic, because you can't deal with the topic, but you can't just let it slide, because that would make Catholicism look bad, so you pretend to discuss when you really have nothing to say.

OK Since you're not interested in the discussion, you can bow out--no one is forcing you to pretend to have thoughts about the matter or have a discussion with those (non-existent) thoughts.

Nope, I knew you'd do that, so I already said I don't want to see a bunch of lazy copy-pasting, but actually engaging with my argument, with its individual parts, dismantling it, piece by piece. Demonstrate its incoherence.

Nope, the topic is about how Mary is not New Eve. You have no way of disproving my assertion, so you want to change the topic to some other argument you think you have better odds of winning--not that you can win that argument, it's just you feel better without the pressure of the actual topic...

I invite you to demonstrate that my argument is not true, but that yours is true--this doesn't involve copying and pasting large swathes of speculations about how Mary is the New Eve, it involves attacking the parts of my argument.

LOL! This is my thread, and I set the topic--ie, "I see you refuse to answer my questions" applies to you. You are incapable of honesty, only deceptive tactics (eg, the aforementioned)--but I guess you're not to blame, since that's what has been sown into you by your church (deceptive tactics...

You desperately want to change the topic because you can't answer the actual topic--Mary as New Eve is an error--and I'm not going to let that happen.

According to the evidence--which evidence you are powerless to respond to.

Your methodology is broken. Let me demonstrate : If I hear you assert that "2 + 2 = 5", and I respond, "No, 2 + 2 = 4; let's examine the evidence, which clearly demonstrates that 2 + 2 = 4, plus, if we keep consistent with the math, we can solve a lot of other problems," but your commitment to a...

You can't actually engage in the discussion, you try to shift the discussion--either Irenaeus erred or he didn't.

You've already been made privy to one--Irenaeus erred when he falsely taught his baseless nonsense about Mary. He's been debunked. The thing with an "infallible" Church is one error brings the entire edifice down. There are many more. Your false understanding of Romans 2--that the "Gentiles" who...

There is only one seed Who is the heir; accordingly, only those who are IN CHRIST, the ONE seed, stand to inherit TOGETHER in the ONE heir, in Whom all are ONE--not heirs OF Christ, but heirs IN Christ, heirs TOGETHER WITH Christ. Galatians 3:16 Now the promises were spoken to Abraham and to...

Yep, I would've been happy to have submitted to an overseer back then--before the impurities crept in--but, today, we have the additional task of actually arriving at a correct understanding.

Your Church system will pass away before Christ returns. It is already being proven erroneous. If you don't want to use your critical thinking skills in this area of life, I guess that's how you live in the rest of your life--uncritically, unthinkingly. That's your call. I can't do it.

Christ is the heir of Abraham, and all those who are in Christ are heirs together with Christ.