Search results

That's your limitation. Your limitation is not in Scripture. How's that silver? :laughing:

So that's what "better" means to you. Sad. How's that silver? :laughing:

Does Jesus disprove Hebrews 8:13?

Yes, Jesus is God. Does Jesus disprove Hebrews 8:13?

Was the old covenant Jesus' words?

Hebrews 9: (NKJV) 18 Therefore not even the first covenant was dedicated without blood. 19 For when Moses had spoken every precept to all the people according to the law, he took the blood of calves and goats, with water, scarlet wool, and hyssop, and sprinkled both the book itself and all the...

Your treasures are old, decayed, and vanished. :laughing: Hebrews 8:13

They related to the old testament. They required death. Hebrews 9 18 Whereupon neither the first testament was dedicated without blood. 19 For when Moses had spoken every precept to all the people according to the law, he took the blood of calves and of goats, with water, and scarlet wool, and...

He took away the first -- sacrifices and burnt offerings; to establish the second -- the offering of His Body once for all. Referring to death, and thus "testament".

New is better than old. Hebrews 8:13

Gold is 62.5 times more valuable than silver. :laughing:

Yes, Hebrews 8:6-10 KJV is correct in referring to a covenant, i.e. an agreement, as opposed to a testament, because there is no mention either explicit or implicit of death. Neither "covenant" nor "testament" appear in Hebrews 10:9-10 KJV, but there are three references which reveal that the...

Hebrews 9 KJV 15 And for this cause he is the mediator of the new testament, that by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions that were under the first testament, they which are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance. 16 For where a testament is, there must also...

Hebrews 8 6 But now hath he obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises. A parable for you. More than once upon a time there was a father who, in his will, bequeathed his son 100 ounces of silver. He...

Explanation? If God was responsible for both ends of the agreement, then Abraham's faith and obedience were irrelevant.

God's New Testament offers no land to Israel. They are more than memorial. They are expiatory. And they are transcended and superseded by Hebrews 10:9-12. Ezekiel 43 19 And thou shalt give to the priests the Levites that be of the seed of Zadok, which approach unto me, to minister unto me...

Saved Israel goes to Heaven. Unsaved Israel goes to hell. What are you talking about?? The issue was whether OT animal sacrifices would be reinstated. They won't. They would desecrate Calvary. Please try to stay on topic.

Hebrews 9:15-18 clearly describes more the "New Testament" than the "New Covenant". The latter is not effectualized "by means of death".

The same place as He gathers all the believing Gentiles. No it won't, because it would desecrate His Once-For-All Sacrifice at Calvary. Like land for Israel, it will never happen. Hebrews 10 9 Then said he, Lo, I come to do thy will, O God. He taketh away the first, that he may establish the...

I like to think of it this way: When our New Covenant conditions of faith and obedience are met, then God's New Testament blessings of forgiveness and eternal life are lavished.