Search results

Those are pretty bold assumptions, friend. I've stuck to Biblically defined terms and conditions, so can you do so also? I've got news for you: if you break ANY ONE OF THEM, YOU'RE GOING TO HELL. So, the best thing for us to do is invite Jesus into our heart and allow Him to live out His...

I don't know...if your kid got stuck having to pay for the crimes of others, how long would it take for you to say, "Alright, people, that's enough"? That's why the "whole duty of man" is to "fear God and keep His commandments", plain and simple.

Jesus did say we're to know if it's at the door.

Thank you for acknowledging the prediction of the coming of Christ in 1844 was not based on a false prophetic revelation from God, but merely an incorrect interpretation of already existing prophetic passages of Scripture. Now, if you're going to condemn Miller and his followers for mistakenly...

The Bible teaches it implicitly and anyone who has eyes to see can do so easily: >The unMarked are clearly identified as those who "keep the commandments of God" which means the Marked don't, and the only commandment end times Christians say we're free to forget is the only one which begins...

If Jesuit "Left Behind" Futurism was true and people who were fully convinced they were saved like the OSAS crowd got left behind, you don't think their entire world would be shattered into a bazillion pieces? They would absolutely be destroyed. In their "disillusioned" state, they'd desperately...

I can put up with insult, disrespect, and even crazy opinions and interpretations but what I can't abide is lies and/or false facts which stubbornly remain on the table when shown to be such, especially when they are intended to discredit others. I think you'll agree that's pretty good grounds...

How exactly can a husband go home to his own wife every night, except that he LOVES her, while other men cheat on their wives incessantly? If we love Jesus, we'll keep His commandments". (John 14:15 KJV)

Sure it does, and is why the entire Protestant world believed and taught for over 3 centuries the Papacy is the First Beast of Rev 13 until for some reason a little over 100 years ago, "protestants" decided to stop protesting and join ranks with Jesuit Futurism and Jesuit Preterism.

You could also say Jesus meant "...left one upon another as they were originally placed" like the rest of the us interpret that to mean, yes?

That is not a future prediction, it is commentary on the past. LAST CHANCE: You said EGW predicted - which means to declare the future before it comes to pass - Jesus would come in 1844. Either show us the document where this pre-1844 prediction was made, retract and apologize for your error...

Mark Twain once said "Never argue with stupid people because they will drag you down to their level then beat you with experience". Therefore, inadequacy need not be the reason at all for why a person chooses to end a discussion.

Be careful with such rigidity: I could argue they ceased to be complete temple stones as soon as they cracked and chipped in the casting down of them, thus, they are not temple stones piled up, just a bunch of rocks. If you insisted that they still qualify as temple stones despite having lost...

There's a very good YT series called "Total Onslaught" about how the occult world has been attacking Jesus since the beginning. I'm sure if you watched it, you'd be agreeing with me, but it's all good.

My comment was to someone else and you kinda interjected yourself without taking the time to acquaint yourself: the mark of a contentious man. I'm not really interested in dealing with such, thank you.

I'm pretty sure Jesus was talking about "no stone left one upon another as they were placed in the building of the temple."

You said she falsely predicted the Second Coming of Jesus in 1844. If you don't produce anything to back that up or apologize for your error, I'm blocking you b/c I will not deal with dishonest people in this chat.

Wait, you think aliens in spaceships abduct people?

I'm pretty sure I answered them. You have yet to produce any evidence that any temple stones remain intact as when they were laid. All I see is stones thrown down and cast to the side which is what happened when they were retrieving the melted gold.