Search results

I am not wrong; but you are the one who is ignorant on the subject. Take your chances. Fornicate. Tell God, I was only supposed to burn with passion: what do you mean I am going to hell? Fornicators shall not inherit the kingdom of God (1 Corinthians 6:9-11). That means that they go to...

And they were first called Christians at Antioch.

You are a false prophet; as will be determined in 2027 when the Lord has not returned by then. The mark of the beast has not been around for the last 100 years. It will be implemented in the last seven years of human history before Christ returns. It is most likely a microchip placed in the...

I believe that it was called "The Way" and "the sect of the Nazarenes."

It is also not arrogance to believe that you have the truth if you know that the Lord Jesus has wonderfully saved you from sin.

She is the mother of His humanity only. His Deity is utterly begotten of the Father. Therefore to say that she is the mother of God is misleading. Is she the mother of the Father, that high and lofty one who inhabiteth eternity (Isaiah 57:15) is the question.

Paper money is not the mark of the beast. It has been around for centuries. The mark of the beast will be implemented in the last seven years of human history before Jesus returns.

If anyone doesn't believe that Jesus is the great I AM, they will die in their sins (John 8:24).

Jesus is God (Hebrews 1:8-9) and raised Himself from the dead (John 10:17-18). I am of the kjv-superior position when it comes to my choice of Bible translations. I hold the kjv to be the authoritative standard when there is any doubt concerning a controversy. If you have to go some other...

It is, indeed, talking about hell. As is substantiated by our understanding that fornicators shall not inherit the kingdom of God; even in the immediate context of the verse (just a chapter before it).

It is how I interpreted it without the added commentary, when I read it first in the kjv without the added commentary. And I believe that I was relying on the Holy Ghost for interpretation, also.

No, they don't. Consider... Jhn 2:18, Then answered the Jews and said unto him, What sign shewest thou unto us, seeing that thou doest these things? Jhn 2:19, Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up. Jhn 2:20, Then said the Jews, Forty and...

Experience does indeed have validity, as it is our testimony (see Revelation 12:10-11).

That is acceptable. Therefore, those who do not resist it to the point of death didn't do so because they made a decision to receive Jesus as their Lord and Saviour at some point in their lives.

My experience of the holy scriptures.

Nope; because the Holy Spirit was at work trying to do this with the people being talked to by Stephen; yet they resisted the Holy Ghost. Which indicates that He (and his grace) can be resisted.

Implied by how it is testified in the kjv; and how it would be clearly interpreted without the added commentary in italics. If you think you won't burn in hell for violating the verse, and violate the verse because you think it is not talking about hell, it is still talking about hell; and you...

I don't understand your point...say it in your own words, please.

Please elaborate on what you think these are.

Yes, seriously. I am unfamiliar with that verse (if it is a verse).