Search results

Like I said before I’m not against using AI for Bible study but I never trust anything doctrinal or anything subjective that it gives me. I use it for things like “Give me all verses that could be related to the MOB even in veiled way.”

If you research it you have to research from a medical perspective because the freely talk about it but if you search from a conspiracy or military angle you wont find anything. I remember several years ago watching a video about a broccoli farm in California where each individual broccoli plant...

This is my AI's response (Claude Sonnet ). This is the prompt I gave it: do you agree with this post? AI: This is clever reasoning, but it has a fundamental problem: it treats the mark's *function in Genesis* as if it must define the mark's *nature in Revelation*. Let me unpack that. The AI...

I'm not saying AI is bad, in fact I made an app that interfaces with this forum so I can use AI to keep up with what I say and what others say. I even use it to make my replies more grammatically correct and more readable (I am not using it on this post lol). So I don't think AI is bad for...

AI is trained on all types of christian writings from atheist linguists to Mormon bible scholars. AI can't be trusted on any judgement calls about the bible.

The same thing that was in the jab is in the air, water, and food. It's also in novocaine, flu shots, and pretty much anything a doctor "treats" illnesses with. Even rabies vaccines for animals have it in them and the pets shed the spike proteins to the owners. We are all connected to the beast...

Or out of God's lignt.... "I am the Light of the world".

We already have nano electronics inside our bodies. All of us have MAC addresses and are nodes on the network right now. None of us volunteered for that and we all have it. I guess from your point of view it starts with digital ID? So what would the mark be? They electronics are already in...

I think that's talking about the cross. Psalm 18 describes what God did when Jesus was crucified. Psalm 18 1To the chief Musician, A Psalm of David, the servant of the LORD, who spake unto the LORD the words of this song in the day that the LORD delivered him from the hand of all his enemies...

The hand represents a man’s works, the forehead is his way of thinking. Both of those in my opinion are related to biblical works and biblical thinking.

Does the old man get destroyed when someone accepts Christ and the day star arises in their hearts? 2 Peter 1:19 have also a more sure word of prophecy; whereunto ye do well that ye take heed, as unto a light that shineth in a dark place, until the day dawn, and the day star arise in your...

The old man isn't an allegory it's a real thing and that old man "opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God". The man of sin is also called the son of perdition. Judas was...

My point is the man of sin is our old man that has been crucified with Christ, not a future antichrist.

I disagree on that one Peter.

What would you consider completely rolled out? Chip in the body? Digital ID?

Does the bible prove flat or round?

I don’t think there are any unforgivable sins besides blaspheming the Holy Spirit.

Manuscripts disagree with each other all over the place, not just here. So do modern translations.

We don't have to agree, I'm just giving what I think. How do you count a number?

It's up the person to decide if God's word in translations are inspired or not. I believe they are, but I do understand most people don't believe that.