Search results

Antichrist never advertises Antichrist. So what does it advertise?

Ahhhhhh, lotsa not good people around. Do they need controlling? putting in their place? giving them the bad news?.....and finally, letting the World know how right we are?

hello

THE BLOOD IS REMOVED IN THE NEW BIBLES Did they clean them up?

The trenches you keep referring to and encouraging others to go into is the same ditch the blind leading the blind fall into

Violence is the very fruit of sin. Violence against yourself, violence against others including the superimposing of violence onto God as if it were part of his character.

It is a given that sin has in it the seeds of its own destruction. Taking this into consideration shifts how one understands the prophetic utterances of destruction. Ignoring it has man superimposing his own fallen character onto God. Judas is an example of destruction. It was done by his own...

This is all in your imagination Wrangler......and frankly, you can't see it any other way because to do so would not support your paradigm. The new wine would burst the old wineskins ie, an electrical short would blow the main fuse. I think the Pharisees experienced this when Jesus rose from the...

I wonder if thalidomide children wonder why God made them without or crippled limbs?

It is also clear, you haven't seen Jesus! Violence begets violence. I'm surprised you don't understand this. Has the pall of darkness hidden even the light from your vision?

It's clear Wrangler, you favour violence as a solution at every turn!

Quoting scripture does not qualify as anything when ones paradigm is faulty. To the fact that you've noticed it , I would say, so what! Any erudite scholar can quote and take scripture out of context to support a faulty view.

If it is objectionable to strike an adult it must be doubly objectionable to strike a child!

Again, overstepping is how you justify yourself Wrangler. Distortion of the reality is a necessary practice in order to maintain your position.

Your terms of 'invaders' is a convenient cover to tar all refugees as criminal and to negate the responsibility of safe haven or does the story of the Good Samaritan convey meaninglessness to you? Highlighting that which is clearly obvious does not qualify as dictating.

I guess Paul was doing a few things but let's just say he spoke to people removed from the Jewish mindset about the forgiveness of their sins and they believed him. From then on their learning trajectory took on new dimensions ie, a new paradigm was initiated. It seems to me that new wine skins...

I guess it's hard to kick against the pricks Wrangler. Blaming others ie, non white, ethnically diverse, to take the blame because they are an easy target. It makes it easier in your own mind that home grown criminals are a minor problem in comparison.

To understand Christianity, you must understand Judaism I guess all those 'good for nothing' pagans Paul preached to who accepted the Gospel must have understood Judaism!

I notice Deb, you always pick the others who are the baddies.....never your own.

Would you befriend tax collectors and prostitutes?