Search results

Why don't you make your points easier to address for me? Why do you have to overwhelm me with 500 points to address? Maybe you can easily address 500 points someone makes and don't mind doing so, but I sure can't, and I do mind trying to do so. Meaning I can't do it per typing but it doesn't...

Let's try this route for a moment and then see if we can get anywhere here. For the sake of argument, regardless that you obviously disagree, let's assume this is the last thing fulfilled in the list--to anoint the most Holy. And one is to make sense of that, exactly how, assuming, for example...

You mean like how you do sometimes yourself, for example, Zechariah 14? Where I already plainly told you that I do not even remotely believe that animal sacrificing resumes, especially after Christ returns. Nor do I believe it resumes at any time, period. Yet, in spite of that you keep telling...

As to verse 24 it is not my position that none of it has been fulfilled. It is my position that some of it hasn't, such as bringing in everlasting righteousness in light of what 2 Peter 3:13 records. And such as the transgression concerning the holy city, in light of 70 AD, and in light of this...

For now let's consider verse 10 first. Zechariah 14:10 All the land shall be turned as a plain from Geba to Rimmon south of Jerusalem: and it shall be lifted up, and inhabited in her place, from Benjamin's gate unto the place of the first gate, unto the corner gate, and from the tower of...

explain how you are dealing with this part then? and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate. Shall make what desolate, and for what reason? It makes zero sense to say that in that verse and then not even have anything in that verse explaining what is being desolated and why.

Let's try and keep it simple for now and mainly focus on this following part. The focus is this--Seventy weeks are determined upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression A typical view which you may or may not hold is this, meaning you may or may not agree that Stephen's stoning marked the...

My guess would be, more likely JW rather than SDA.

I find it bizarre that you ask that in light of the manner in which you interpret verse 27, that only the beginning through the middle of the 70th week is in view, and not also after the middle through the end. On no calculator can you add 69(verse 25) plus 1/2(verse 27 and your version of it)...

Try reading what the text actually says. Then use Scripture in the book of Daniel to interpret Scripture. First of all here is what the text actually says---and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate. Let's stop here for now. What needs to be asked and have an answer...

None of you have done any such thing until you have shown it with the text itself. Verse 27 is the text itself, so where is there anything in that verse that supports that the 70 weeks ended in 34 AD? On another note, obviously once Christ returns all these things will be revealed where it is...

Let's start with number 6 on your list. Per verse 24 that is basically the last thing on the list, yet you have it being the first thing that is fulfilled. Why don't you stick with the flow brought out in verse 24, rather than being all over the place by making it in any order you please...

It would be involving wrath not grace. That much should be crystal clear. After all, it is involving abominations. And it's not like the 42 month reign of the beast recorded in Revelation does not involve abominations, in light of Revelation 17-18, for instance. But everyone wants to interpret...

Speculation is all they have in this case, not Scripture. Nowhere in all of verse 27 does it give the impression 34 AD is meant by this---and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate...

Certainly not you nor @Spiritual Israelite , nor am I saying you are, nor have I ever been saying that. Because if you think I have, speaking of comprehension needing to be checked, it equally applies to you then. I'm coming from this perspective, that, if in reality verse 27 is the entire 70th...

You two might not be doing that intentionally, yet you are still doing it if all of verse 27 involves the 70th week and that you have the end of verse 27 meaning 70 AD. That logically adds up to that the 70 weeks concluded in 70 AD if the entire verse 27 is meaning the beginning and ending of...

What is the point of everlasting righteousness unless it affects everyone on the planet equally? When the NHNE are ushered in do you agree or disagree that everlasting righteousness will affect everyone equally? If you agree, and surely you do, how can you insist everlasting righteousness has...

What I was thinking is this, though. 2 Peter 3:13 wasn't already applicable 2000 years ago when Peter spoke those words. And that verse is still not applicable as we speak. I don't know what you are trying to conflate with what here, but everlasting righteousness can't be brought in until the...

Matthew 23:39 For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord. I'm not saying @Douggg is correct about that verse, but it's a no brainer you are not correct about that verse for certain. The first thing to note is this...

Let's asume the 70 weeks were fulfilled without any gaps. According to Daniel 9:24 one of the things that have to be brought in once the 70 weeks have concluded is everlasting righteousness. Obviously, everlasting righteousness can't logically fit within an age that is finite, such as the age we...