Search results

Let's just say, maybe there are some posts I have made in the past that are hard to follow. Ok, fine. But even so, what I posted per post #16 couldn't possibly be a post that is hard to follow, though. I would think even a 5th grader could follow that quite easily. That's what kind of hurt my...

Matthew 12:40 For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth. What kind of argument is that? That would be like arguing, since this passage above, for example, is involving literal 24 hour...

IMO, too many interpreters are trying to make 2 Peter 3:8 more complicated than it is. It simply means, the same way 24 hours and one day are the exact same thing, so is a thousand years and one day the exact same thing. For example, 12am to 12 am = 24 hours, thus equals one day. 1900 AD to...

Should I just flat out lie then? Would that be better? Where I then say Amil makes sense of all prophecies in both the OT and NT to me. Which would be me lying about that since it is not how I see it. Therefore, in my mind Premil is still relevant until someone can reasonably explain these...

Apparently, you must not have been able to follow my post either since I clearly explained why. Yet you act as if I didn't. It's one thing to not agree with what I concluded, it's another thing to act as if I never provided any reasons why, period. The latter is being deceitful about what I...

Do you even understand, lol, that what you are proposing is making total nonsense out of the chronology involved? Meaning how do you reconcile that with the following recorded in that same chapter? Daniel 7:11 I beheld then because of the voice of the great words which the horn spake: I...

I just submitted what I said in post #16 to Chatgpt and asked it to summarize it for me. At least it had no problem following me, lol. Here is how it summarized my post. ------------------- This poster is engaging with the interpretation of Revelation 20 and making a distinction between the...

What is so difficult about following that? You seem to be following @Spiritual Israelite ok but have no idea how to make sense of anything I said? Kind of hurts my feelings and makes me feel like I must be coming off as retarded or something, that it is impossible to follow what I'm meaning. I'm...

Unless I consider Premil as a valid option many passages in both the OT and NT make zero sense to me if Amil is the only valid option. You just don't seem to get that.

What I have noted in Revelation 20 is that neither satan nor the beast and fp are standing among the dead being judged in Revelation 20:11-15 because they are already in the LOF. Which then means what Revelation 20:10 is involving is not the same thing Revelation 20:11-15 is involving. They have...

Both Amil and some Premils disagree with what is recorded in Rvelation 20. Nowhere in that chapter does it ever say anyone dies during the millennium. It says they die after the millennium, verse 9---and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them. Which means there is only death...

I have no choice to if Premil is Biblical but Amil isn't. It's not like the NHNE don't begin with the 2nd coming. There is no way around that though most Premils think there is. Meaning that the NHNE begin with the 2nd coming. What is your view of the following in Isaiah 60, meaning what are...

In your world, I guess, there are no other possibilities, only what you have concluded? You do not think---The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation--is involving the vials of wrath but is involving the LOF during...

Even though I'm Premil, some Premils are not being consistent at times. Maybe even me at times. But in this case not meaning me as well. Some examples. Revelation 2:26 And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give power over the nations: Most Premils apply...

Is it possible that your interpretation, or even my interpretation of Revelation 20 is what doesn't make any sense to him rather than Revelation 20 doesn't make sense to him, period? I have been knowing him for years, and I suspect it is the former rather than the latter, in this case. And I...

Guess what? I pretty much agree with you about some of that. But even so, one then has to explain verses 16-19 since they would be meaning after Luke 17:29 is fulfilled. And that those verses say one can be punished if they fail to come up. Let's look at a cpl of things here...

Why does it have to be meaning at the end of satan's little season after the millennium? Why can't it be meaning in the beginning of the millenium? What would they need fuel for a thousand years from now at the end of satan's little season when the great white throne judgment would be the next...

How then do you see it connecting with Daniel's prophecy?

Revelation 2:8 And unto the angel of the church in Smyrna write; These things saith the first and the last, which was dead, and is alive(zao) Take this verse, for example. We should believe, per this context, that zao doesn't mean the reason He is alive(zao) is because He was initially dead...

I fully agree Paul in 2 Thessalonians 2 was writing about Daniel's prophecy. But I suspect we are not interpreting it in the same manner. For example, 2 Thessalonians 2:4. I don't take anything in that verse to be meaning in a literal sense such as a literal rebuilt temple in Jerusalem but that...