Search results

1. Paul says "as Eve, so you" : Christ is the fulfillment of the Adam type (Ro 5; 1 Co 15). Who was Adam's bride? His own body. Thus the Church is called the body and the bride of Christ. Therefore, Paul sees that the Church is like Christ's Eve. 2. ChatGPT rightly pointed out that the Marian...

IDK if you know, but Luther, though I disagree with him, saw the Reformers as the continuation of that Church, and saw the Catholics as breaking off from the original Church.

The Law had concessions given for the hardness of men's hearts, which Christ nullifies--eg, "any cause divorce" had been given to them, but, now, Jesus says that is no longer permitted (Mt 19)--and taking of vows is one of them. James says it : make no vow AT ALL. "You heard it say 'pay your...

As already noted in the OP, which you are free to respond to, since it sets the topic, Paul already identified the Church as the antitype to Eve (2 Co 11:3).

Well, not that I want to change the topic, but there is actually a "wrinkle" on that one : John the Apostle does address spiritual "fathers" in 1 John, and Paul says "I became your father", so it seems Jesus was saying "Do not boast of yourselves with titles", but when someone is spiritually...

I went ahead and put him on ignore. He had nothing to say, no defense for the assault on his Church's nonsense tradition. LOL

Nah, actually, I'll just put you on ignore. You're not an honest person. Buh bye!

As soon as you address how Paul has demolished your beliefs about Mary that were invented by a 2nd century man. Easy peasy.

Are marital vows vows? Yes? I'm against them. When He prohibited taking of vows, and James confirms it by saying "take no vow at all"?

OK Thanks for the info, and the invite to your decrepit incoherent insanity, so are you going away now?

Numbers 23 4Now God met Balaam, and he said to Him, “I have set up the seven altars, and I have offered up a bull and a ram on each altar.” 5Then the LORD put a word in Balaam’s mouth and said, “Return to Balak, and you shall speak thus.” 6So he returned to him, and behold, he was standing...

Already told you : John 6.

@Doug Are you a Black Hebrew Israelite?

Right, and then that nonsense was addressed and debunked, just like all the rest of your nonsense, so did you have an answer?

You're admittedly not even interested in engaging with the claims I backed up. Why are you asking for claims to be backed up that you're not even willing to engage with? You make no sense.

OK Why do you need to inform me of that, then? Go away.

Interesting, because Paul uses that same verse in his exposition of the Gospel to the Roman Church. No, 3000 were saved on that day--of the very same people Peter says crucified Jesus. It can be both condemnation and salvation--same thing Paul says ("God is righteous to condemn your sin" and...

I don't really want to change the topic--you have a way of changing the topic.

Are you saying you think you knew as much on the day you received the Spirit as you do today? Granted, it's the same nonsense, I'm sure, but you know a lot more nonsense today, right? LOL!

Nope, I already proved Peter preached much more than that, you have just decided to act as if I hadn't. Also, Peter and Paul cited the same verse "whoever calls on the Name of the LORD shall be saved"--they preached the same Gospel, as I have detailed.