Search results

What are you talking about? AI?! You are making excuses because you can’t refute my testimony biblically like I did.

Sigh!!!. Typical false Premillennialism doctrine that deceived YOU! My goodness. Have you ever read Scripture carefully and think and compare it with the rest of Scripture to find exactly what God talks about. Here are questions for you to answer: What testimony will the Two Witnesses...

Oh, really? That is where your problem begun. :laughing: That means your doctrines build upon on what they believe instead of the Word of God. Bad move. That does not sounds like you are studying like a Berean. :rolleyes: I do not care what they believe. I tested their doctrine with...

No, it does not. Please read the passage carefully: 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17 [16] For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: [17] Then we which are alive and remain shall be...

Good. Well, not quite correct. The phrase “we which are alive and remain” does not mean Christians who merely survive something or escape some particular event. Paul is referring to the remaining living Elect—those Chosen ones who are still physically alive on earth when Christ returns. They...

Private interpreations. That interpretation is incorrect. Revelation 14:14 does not teach that Jesus returns to remove believers from the earth. You first need to understand the vision in Revelation 14:1–5. The 144,000 with the Lamb on Mount Zion represents the redeemed people of God—the...

I think several points here go beyond what the text actually says. Zechariah 4 does not identify the two anointed ones as John the Baptist and Jesus. In the immediate context, the two anointed ones are associated with the lampstand, olive trees, and the rebuilding of God’s house (Zech. 4:2–6...

Here.

Show me! And what does the context about? No! LOL. Weak arguments. Another example of your use of extra-biblical! The Book/Epistle of Barnabas is not part of Scripture and is not included in the biblical canon of mainstream Christianity. Therefore the the Epistle of Barnabas is not inspired...

Okay, you quoted the Scriptures, but I'm not sure what conclusion you believe they establish concerning Revelation 11? I agree that Revelation is a divine revelation, that God's thoughts are higher than ours, and that spiritual truth is discerned through the Holy Spirit. I don't disagree with...

No offense taken at all. I simply pray that the Lord will give you greater understanding of what Scripture actually teaches concerning these things. Yes, I am Sola Scriptura. I believe Scripture is the final and sufficient authority for doctrine and for interpreting Scripture. That does not...

I've already explained my position to you and many people multiple times in previous discussions, including the biblical reasoning behind it. I'm not going to keep repeating the same argument every time you ask, especially when we've already debated this subject at length. If you genuinely want...

Simply repeating a number six times does not establish that the number must be understood as a literal 1,000 solar years. Revelation is filled with symbolic numbers, imagery, and visions. The question is not how many times “1,000 years” appears, but how Revelation uses the number within its...

Ah, I see how this works now. :stageright: When “one hour” supports your doctrine, it’s literal; when taking it literally creates a problem for your interpretation, suddenly it becomes “a brief time” or “an appointed season.” That sounds less like letting Scripture interpret Scripture and more...

Oh, absolutely! And I'm the king of England. LOL. The amount of effort you've spent defending that literal 1,000-year reign says otherwise. Sure—says those who read the text only at the surface level and then confuse literalism with sound biblical interpretation. Apparently, spiritual...

Literal bodies, lying on a literal street, in a literal city, while the entire literal world watches their literal deaths and literally exchanges gifts to celebrate? Wow… when you repeat the word “literal” enough times, I suppose it makes the interpretation automatically true. LOL! The...

Nope. The idea of John the Baptist and Jesus as the Two Witnesses, two anointed ones, etc. is NOT correct. Zechariah 4:14 must first be interpreted within Zechariah 4. Two olive trees/branches → two anointed ones The work → restoration of God's house The power → God's Spirit Therefore, saying...

You are actually proving my point rather than answering it. YOU were the one bringing "extra-biblical" material and interpretations into the discussion to begin with. You are appealing to ideas and traditions outside the completed Scriptures—including the Book of Enoch—and then attempting to...

So when you say, "know the history." The question is what history? Just make sure it is BIBLICAL history, and NOT the ramblings of secular historians or reprobates like Josephus. I place no emphasis on personal opinion or private interpretations. As for history--if it's not biblical history...

The Bible does NOT support "pre-tribulation rapture". Christ will come on the Last Day at the Last Trump "after the tribulation". Period. It is because you got the timing of 1,000 year millennial and 7 years "tribulation" period all wrong. On the Last Day, Christ will bring all believers...