Search results

You guys...

The Book of Enoch?! Oh brother. Biblical believing Christians should be very cautious about reading the Book of Enoch as though it were Scripture. It is NOT part of the biblical canon, and there is no command in Scripture telling Christians to study it as an authoritative revelation from God...

Your demand for a “yes or no” answer may satisfy your idea of manners, but it does absolutely nothing to demonstrate that you understand Scripture. I already explained my position, and you apparently learned nothing from it. Instead of demanding a simplistic answer, try actually studying...

Go back and re-read post over and over until you figure out my answer. Take care!

You don't seem to understand the point I'm making. You may not even understand what the beast represents in Scripture. The real questions are: WHO receives the Mark of the Beast? WHEN does it happen? And HOW does it happen? Revelation 14:9–10 is describing those who receive the mark and...

You clearly don't understand what the Mark of the Beast is, who receives it, or why they receive it. So let’s start there. The Mark of the Beast is NOT some random physical object that a Christian accidentally receives and then suddenly loses salvation. Revelation 13 presents the mark as...

Quoting Revelation 14:9–10 without explaining how it supposedly refutes my argument doesn't constitute a refutation. In fact, if you actually read the passage in context, it supports the very point I made. Ahem... Please allow me to rant. :bigCeeze Note the biblical phrase the "Patience of the...

Come on, you guys with ridiculous literal interpretations. The Mark of the beast is NOT a magic physical tattoo or implant that can affect your soul. The question itself needs to be corrected. Revelation 13 does not teach that a physical tattoo, earring, piercing, chip, implant, or any...

Told you so, @CrowCross

Do you realize that the Bible has chapters and verses? If you believe the Word of God is the authority, then quote the verse(s) that support what you are claiming. Don’t simply say, “This is what the Bible teaches,” “This is what my favorite pastor teaches,” or “This is what the author of Left...

You have no clues with your own false doctrine? The Dispensational Premillennialism, especially the pre-tribulation rapture view, believe in "secret rapture." According to this doctrine, Christ comes twice in relation to the end times: First, secretly to take believers ("the rapture") before...

Wrong. It is His interpretation that we must seek and find in His Word—not our own private interpretation. We study the book of Daniel by comparing Scripture with Scripture and allowing the Bible to reveal God’s meaning behind His prophecies. We should not rely on current events, world news...

No, no, no. See, you did not offer Scripture support your claim here. Anyway, the Bible does not teach that Christ secretly removes His Church seven years before the Great Tribulation. Scripture teaches that the elect will endure tribulation, and Christ will gather His people after the...

Yes I knew that. Correction: The little period of period will arrive at the end of time after God first seal all of His People. Nothing to do with Antiochus Epiphanes IV, 70AD, Pegan Roman, Roman Catholic Church, etc. This is where we are clearly miles apart on the timing of the little horn...

You are getting warmer. I have been teaching that the horn in Scripture symbolizes power. The little horn represents a short period of a greater apostate power — a continuation of the same opposition against Christ and His Church that has been working throughout history, but intensified...

Yes, tribulation is promised for all saints in Christ. Jesus Himself said, “In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world” (John 16:33). Paul also taught, “we must through much tribulation enter into the kingdom of God” (Acts 14:22). But what you are...

Where? Where is the proof of your claim? Post number that response to ME. Show me. LOL! Please do if you wish. However, putting me on ignore does not prevent me from responding to your public posts or pointing out errors in your arguments for others to see. Ignoring me does not make an...

He did. False prophet with unbiblical teaching that should be rejected because it conflicts with the plain teaching of Scripture, eg. Matthew 24:29-31. NEXT.

Clearly this means you admit that you cannot provide Scripture when I asked. :laughing:

According to what Scripture? This is your speculation. Ha. Here is a valuable lesson for you to learn: Consensus is not the arbiter of Truth. Selah. Where? Show me where you shown that to me. Whose math? Yours or God? Where have you presented to me directly when I asked for it? Why...