Search results

Clearly not a bible student. :laughing:

LOL. That response does not answer the challenge; it only avoids it. If my understanding is supposedly “too complicated,” then it should be easy for you to provide the actual Scripture that clearly states a literal seven-year tribulation and a literal 3½-year period. LOL! The burden of...

Where does it say in Scripture that you can simple ass 1,260 literal day to "figure out when Jesus Physically come to Earth". Looks like another speculation on your part without Biblical support whatsoever!

Yeah more like SPECULATIONS.

Can't answer questions? Cant find verse to support your false 7 years doctrine? Surprise...surprise... Luke 21:15. :bigCeeze

Can't answer questions? Cant find verse to support your false 7 years doctrine? Surprise...surprise... Luke 21:15. :laughing:

That still doesn’t prove your argument. The fact that the Essenes may have used Daniel 9 to anticipate the Messiah does not establish your interpretation of Revelation, nor does it prove a future seven-year Tribulation. You keep jumping from “the Essenes used Daniel 9” to “therefore Revelation...

Because you say so” works both ways. You don’t get to dismiss an argument with “LOL… NEXT” simply because you don’t want to deal with the Scriptures behind it. I’m not claiming the pretribulation rapture is false merely because I personally dislike it. I’m saying it is not taught in Scripture...

Huh? That is a strange appeal to the Essenes, because it does absolutely nothing to prove your interpretation of Revelation. Yes, the Qumran community associated by many scholars with the Essenes used a 364-day solar calendar. But their calendar was a sectarian practice, not a divine command...

Not if its the truth. Yes, the pretribulation rapture doctrine is false and is NOT gospel.

The Lord never said anything about “3½ literal years” here. That interpretation is not stated in the text—it is imposed upon the text to make it conform to a man-made doctrinal system. The numbers in Revelation are not given so that we can turn them into a literal calendar, count off 1,260...

Of course, because you have been brainwashed by the PreTrib false prophets like millions of Christians.

Facepalm. Here you go again. You have misunderstood what I meant by the “woman” representation in Galatians 4. I am not saying that Paul cannot use the woman imagery in the New Covenant era. He obviously does. My point is that the covenant represented by the woman changes at the Cross...

Thank you Angelina.

I already explained verses many times. You guys dont like hearing this. No spiritual ears.

Yes, it does! You are not reading very well, because you purposely omitted something. Read the full verse: Dan 9:26 (26) And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary...

God did. It is His interpretation which we must compare Scripture with Scripture. Spiritual discernment. Case Closed.

You think, huh? You have completely misunderstood my argument—and in doing so, you have confused the use of an Old Covenant figure as an illustration with bringing the Old Covenant woman herself into the New Covenant as though she remained part of the covenant community. Paul’s argument in...

Good luck with your future messiah and so-called 3.5 literal years. LOL

Wrong Jews. Wrong Judea. Wrong City. Wrong Temple. Spiritual Discerned. :laughing: