Search results

I see the two witnesses as the Law and the Prophets that testified and pointed to Jesus

Matthew 24 36 “But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son,[f] but only the Father. 37 As it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. 38 For in the days before the flood, people were eating and drinking, marrying and giving...

Revelation 19 reads nothing like Zachariah 14

We follow Jesus now on earth its a figure of speech, we don't actually follow Him anywhere. Revelation 19 17 And I saw an angel standing in the sun, who cried in a loud voice to all the birds flying in midair, “Come, gather together for the great supper of God, 18 so that you may eat the flesh...

How can 1 Thess 4 be the pre trib rapture when Jesus says that He carries out the judgement and separation when He returns? Matthew 16 27 For the Son of Man is going to come in his Father’s glory with his angels, and then he will reward each person according to what they have done. Matthew 25...

1 Thessalonians is the second coming Revelation 19 doesn’t mention Jesus coming to the earth, He is only shown up in heaven, it is a symbolic for judgement from the sword of Jesus mouth His word Mathew, Mark and Luke are coming in judgements Jesus said that when He returns it will be with...

Sadley, I do also think that he's playing games at this point. He asked something, then gets the answer and asked the same question again, its a shame there are unwritten rules for debating.

Instead of what you posted why don't you actually address what WPM said? Why would WPM answer you if you don't address what he posted first? Be honest in your debating, debating is addressing each other's views not ignoring one's views and posting your views. If we do that it helps us...

Yes amen post #760 clearly explains Revelation 2:22-23

You can't debate with a guy like this with blinders on. He has already decided in his head what he thinks I believe and can't change his view even when I plainly state what I believe. Even after being proven by his own words his pride and stubbornness won't admit that he misrepresented me. When...

See post #764

Before I reply to this, why did you just ignore the fact that I posted you saying something that you said you didn’t say? That’s not honest debating and showing you in bad character. I won’t address anything else with you until you acknowledge that you said something you said you didn’t say. I...

This is your post below "What is your point in continuing to repeat this! Is it not because you are trying very hard to prove your unbiblical doctrine? It is your doctrine that says 70 AD had to be great tribulation that Christ assigns specifically to His disciples, because if it is not great...

It's this easy 1 John 2:19 They went out from us, but they did not really belong to us. For if they had belonged to us, they would have remained with us; but their going showed that none of them belonged to us. The wrath of God (or the tribulation) will come on these people who some thought...

No,I never said that the great tribulation that Jesus assigned to the church was the wrath of God. I actually said the opposite I'm repeating it because you're not getting what I'm saying even thought I keep explaining it.

Of course many knew that it was the wrath of God, how can you not see what I'm saying? It was the wrath of God but a time of tribulation for them. Not the same tribulation as in upon the church but a type tribulation to them You are hung up on a word but not understanding that that word can...

So He sits until satan is defeated in Revelation 20:7 then

It was the Father that wasn't put under Him 1 Corinthians 15 27 For he “has put everything under his feet.”[c] Now when it says that “everything” has been put under him, it is clear that this does not include God himself, who put everything under Christ.

But it was a tribulation in their eyes

It was spiritual Israelite who mentioned rev 2.22 not me