Search results

Sword, I am definitely not hurt. I wanted some clarification from you as to what the specific issues are against the people here. I asked for dot points. You state, 'One I am not disgruntled as you asumme. I love all of you'. These comments from your OP do not sound like love in action: 'its...

You blame us for not being Christ-like in our comments. In your posts so far in this thread, what statements have you made that are NOT Christ-like?

Sword, So that I better understand why you are disgruntled with the posters on CyB, would you please list in dot point form what 'same old garbage' we are promoting all the time. Please be specific so that we can know what you are talking about. Some may want to correct their 'lack of...

Please provide the biblical evidence to support your assertions here.

I find that analogy to be disgusting!

Are you pointing to something I wrote about Calvin that was illogical? If so, please refer me to the post #. Oz

The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops wrote this about the Catholic Church Catechism: What is a brief history of the Catechism? The Catechism of the Catholic Church originated with a recommendation made at the Extraordinary Synod of Bishops in 1985. In 1986 Pope John Paul II...

Catechism is the correct spelling.

I've already given that information in this thread at #1303. Seems like you are not reading what I write. If you continue like this, I'll disengage with you.

What a joke!

You've jumped in before I finished composing what I wrote here. Is Ithaca College Library a sufficiently accurate source for differentiation of primary vs secondary sources online? Kepha's post demonstrates that the CCC is a secondary source because he, a Roman Catholic, stated that 'the CCC is...

There you go! You've proved that the the Catholic Church Catechism is a secondary document because the footnotes came before it. AND the Scriptures came before it. You confirm this with your statement that the CCC is a 'condensed form of the footnotes', thus making the footnotes the primary...

You must think I'm foolish. Your first post between 1230-1294 is at #1285. So are you banking on others like BoL to provide your evidence? It was you who wrote: I've seen lots of bickering, people not understanding what a primary source and a secondary source is, people making rediculously...

Your assertions/opinions here prove nothing without specific evidence.

Please become informed of the nature of logical fallacies and the damage they do to logical, reasonable and rational discussions in any conversation, including on a Christian Forum. Pointing out a logical fallacy is not a red herring but an attempt to get the discussion back on track without...

It's right on target. In #1282, I explained the nature of a red herring fallacy. In my discussion with you re Calvin's support of the perpetual virginity of Mary and his doctrine of double predestination, would you please direct me to where I stated you committed a red herring when discussing...

See #1282 above.

Quoting John Calvin to deal with the perpetual virginity of Mary is pointless as there would be other Calvin doctrines with which you would disagree. Calvin believed in double predestination. i.e. Christians are predestined to salvation and unbelievers are predestined to damnation by God. Do...