Search results

Read again.

Oh, wow, cultism? How original. It’s not cultism at all — it’s simply letting Scripture interpret Scripture and be its own interpreter. But I guess that’s too much truth for you to handle, so you just label it to avoid facing reality. Thanks for confirming you’d rather cling to private opinion...

How about the 66 books of the Bible? Doesn't interpretation belong to God? Gen 40:8 (8) And they said unto him, We have dreamed a dream, and there is no interpreter of it. And Joseph said unto them, Do not interpretations belong to God? tell me them, I pray you. That's what my testimony is...

Why? Because this final week is NOT a literal seven-year period limited to when Christ confirmed the New Covenant. Rather, it represents the entire New Covenant era—from the Cross all the way to the Consummation. It is all about the great commission of the New Testament congregation. Period...

“No, it wasn’t. That’s just your unbiblical made-up private interpretation trying to pass as truth. Sorry to burst your 34AD bubble. Blah blah blah—‘dispensationalized’ this, ‘undetermined’ that. Your tired buzzwords don’t refute a single thing. The final covenant week is still rolling on...

LOL. Your carnal mind blinds you to what’s plainly revealed. I read with the spiritual discernment the Lord grants—something clearly missing from your approach.

Desolate upon the Old Testament congregation, and their kingdom representative was already taken from them. Nothing to do with "physical" city and the sanctuary. That’s pure private interpretation—completely disconnected from what God actually says. You’re arbitrarily forcing verse 26 to...

I think you overreacted. Need some tissues? LOL. How? No, your interpretation is fundamentally flawed. Each verse refers to a distinct desolation, and you are wrongly conflating them. Verse 26 concerns the judgment upon the Old Testament congregation—the people of Israel at the time which...

I don't feel embarrassed at all. I knew exactly what I am doing.

Bust. I was playing YOUR game of spewing false accusations before, so I was successful this time. :-) Spare me the empty laughter. Context is exactly why your interpretation fails—you’re forcing 'consummation' from verse 27 back into verse 26, ignoring the actual sequence. The city and...

LOL. Dan 9:26-27 (26) And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined...

LOL, you don't know my strategy plan. It appears that I have successfully prompted you two to clarify your position for future reference, as you shall see.

No. I was getting both of you to state your positions clearly for the sake of clarification. Completely false. You’re twisting the text. The 'consummation' in verse 27 has nothing to do with the destruction of the city and sanctuary in verse 26—they were already desolate at that point. Verse...

Sorry to disappoint you. I’m not a date setter. LOL!!

Yeah.... They tend to apply or link the desolate of verse 27 back to the desolations of verse 26, thinking they are one and the same while ignoring the confirmation of a covenant that separates verse 27 from 26. Crazy interpretation.

Not at all...because you said... 34 AD?! Seriously? Show me the Scripture—oh wait, you can’t, because you just pulled that out of thin air. You even slap a “consummation” date on it like you’re selling prophecy on clearance. Verse 27? You butchered it. It has nothing to do with Jewish...

Now you admit that the 70th week ended in 70AD?

Well, I agreed. Here is the breakdown of the 70 weeks that we all can agree: 7 + 62 + 1. With the 1 being the final covenant week. The way I see how they dishonestly handled Daniel 9:26-27. There is no way biblically that they can break down the final covenant week of verse 27 and apply the...

Then you and SI believe that Daniel's 70 weeks did not end in 70AD? But when exactly did the consummation take place in verse 27? I asked because SI wrote in his post, "Daniel 9:26-27 is about the physical destruction of Jerusalem and the temple buildings. The consummation refers to the...

I already explained this before. But like I said, but since you don’t like hearing it, you resorted to accusing me of “gnosis psychosis” and tried to split the 70 weeks into orphaned, undetermined, and determined segments, blah blah... If you believe I’m wrong, then tell me—when does the...