Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. TribulationSigns

    In Daniel 8, 11, and 12, is A4E meant? Or is a future anti-christ meant?

    I will take it that you refuse to answer a simple question based on your doctrine, anyway. Yeah, got it.
  2. TribulationSigns

    In Daniel 8, 11, and 12, is A4E meant? Or is a future anti-christ meant?

    It still applies to you and Spiritual Israelite, whether you two agree doctrinally or not, although pretty close. I should have mentioned SI in the first place since this is what his doctrine believe. Regardless I wanted to know what you AND Spiritual Israelite believe when the everlasting...
  3. TribulationSigns

    In Daniel 8, 11, and 12, is A4E meant? Or is a future anti-christ meant?

    Agreed too. Spiritually, the Old Testament congregation was desolate and fell at the Cross. And the New Testament congregation was spiritually rebuilt by Christ in three days. Done but it was NOT considered as the consummation of verse 27 as the Spiritual Israelites believed. Good. The...
  4. TribulationSigns

    In Daniel 8, 11, and 12, is A4E meant? Or is a future anti-christ meant?

    See. You really can't answer the question. Try again.
  5. TribulationSigns

    In Daniel 8, 11, and 12, is A4E meant? Or is a future anti-christ meant?

    Cited from Spiritual Israelite's post, whether YOU agree with it partly or fully: Just once.
  6. TribulationSigns

    In Daniel 8, 11, and 12, is A4E meant? Or is a future anti-christ meant?

    I will going to turn the table away from Davidpt on you and ask the same question to you who believe in Hearsay Partial Preterism Amillennialist doctrine. If your doctrine insisted that the Seventy week of Daniel expired in 70AD when you believe was the consummation, THEN when did the...
  7. TribulationSigns

    In Daniel 8, 11, and 12, is A4E meant? Or is a future anti-christ meant?

    You clearly think you’re clever, but you’re just recycling weak talking points that miss the heart of the matter. Getting under my skin? That’s laughable — I’m focused on truth, not insults. Shhh. I was clarifying for the readers here. If you believer the mystery that the Gentiles believers...
  8. TribulationSigns

    In Daniel 8, 11, and 12, is A4E meant? Or is a future anti-christ meant?

    Not Preterism version. It's Amillennialism version. Read the context: Luk 24:44-49 (44) And he said unto them, These are the words which I spake unto you, while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the...
  9. TribulationSigns

    In Daniel 8, 11, and 12, is A4E meant? Or is a future anti-christ meant?

    You call me a ‘real piece of work’? Good. The truth has a way of getting under people’s skin, doesn’t it? An Amillennialist believes Jesus has been reigning His kingdom since His resurrection — that’s a biblical fact, not a theory. When He confirmed the covenant WITH His millennial kingdom...
  10. TribulationSigns

    In Daniel 8, 11, and 12, is A4E meant? Or is a future anti-christ meant?

    I can see that. It was entertaining! You’re doubling down on that flawed doctrine of yours by chopping the Olivet Discourse into two events. Bold and… original. Meanwhile, you’re the one confidently spreading the falsehood that ‘All partial preterists are amillennialists.’ Talk about irony...
  11. TribulationSigns

    In Daniel 8, 11, and 12, is A4E meant? Or is a future anti-christ meant?

    We are ALL amillennialists, yet I am the true amillennialist when you two aren't, especially when you guys are playing around with the false doctrine of preterism as far as 70AD and the fullfillment of Daniel 9:24-27 are concerned.
  12. TribulationSigns

    In Daniel 8, 11, and 12, is A4E meant? Or is a future anti-christ meant?

    So? I’m free to address your flawed message for the benefit of future readers who will compare it with mine and see the difference. You and Earburner are both wrong, and the record should reflect that. Not at all. Not a mistake — entirely on purpose, and for good reason. I don’t need your...
  13. TribulationSigns

    In Daniel 8, 11, and 12, is A4E meant? Or is a future anti-christ meant?

    Daniel 8:13-14 is related to Revelation 11:1-2. Rev 11:1-2 (1) And there was given me a reed like unto a rod: and the angel stood, saying, Rise, and measure the temple of God, and the altar, and them that worship therein. (2) But the court which is without the temple leave out, and measure it...
  14. TribulationSigns

    In Daniel 8, 11, and 12, is A4E meant? Or is a future anti-christ meant?

    I knew that your doctrine of Daniel 9:24-27 because of this: Daniel’s “people” in 9:24 are not limited to the ethnic Jews under the Old Covenant. In Christ, all saints — Old Testament and New Testament — make up the true “Congregation of Israel” (Galatians 3:29, Romans 9:6–8). That includes...
  15. TribulationSigns

    In Daniel 8, 11, and 12, is A4E meant? Or is a future anti-christ meant?

    Misquote. I never said “immediately” to mean minutes or hours later — I’m following Daniel’s 7+62+1 structure. Christ’s public ministry belongs to the 62 weeks; His death ends the 69th week and begins the 70th week — the one-week covenant confirmation Daniel described. Show where your chronology...
  16. TribulationSigns

    In Daniel 8, 11, and 12, is A4E meant? Or is a future anti-christ meant?

    LOL. The end of the 69th week is the start of the 70th week—fact. So yes, Christ’s crucifixion did confirm the covenant for that one final week with the CHURCH, just as I’ve explained repeatedly, completely demolishing your baseless fantasy about baptism confirmation beforehand. Your denial...
  17. TribulationSigns

    In Daniel 8, 11, and 12, is A4E meant? Or is a future anti-christ meant?

    LOL. The end of the 69th week is the start of the 70th week—fact. So yes, Christ’s crucifixion did confirm the covenant for that one final week, just as I’ve explained repeatedly, completely demolishing your baseless fantasy about baptism confirmation. Your denial? Totally predictable. Looks...
  18. TribulationSigns

    In Daniel 8, 11, and 12, is A4E meant? Or is a future anti-christ meant?

    Ah, classic false accusation at its finest. Since you’re so confident, why don’t you show me—straight from Daniel 9 or anywhere else in Scripture—where it clearly says how the covenant "FOR" the ONE FINAL (70th) WEEK began? And when is the consummation OF THE FINAL WEEK, exactly?
  19. TribulationSigns

    In Daniel 8, 11, and 12, is A4E meant? Or is a future anti-christ meant?

    Oh, you’re still blind to the very Word of God I’ve carefully laid out for you? How surprising—after all the times I’ve quoted Scripture, word for word, and yet you still refuse to accept it. By all means, keep denying it; I’m sure that helps your case. But just so you know, the Lord is the...
  20. TribulationSigns

    Does Understanding Eschatology Prove You Are Saved?

    You still don't understand the Covenant relationship. There is the Covenant Kingdom that is in heaven, which we will inherit and enter when we die or when Christ comes again. And then there is the earthly Covenant Kingdom, which both believers and unbelievers are part of. Selah! The short...